A NAME OF THE COMPANY WAS CHANGED FROM X LTD TO SAY Y LTD. THE SAID CHANGE WAS INTIMATED TO THE AO DURING THE ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS. THE AO STILL PASSED THE ASSESSMENT ORDER U/S 143(3) IN THE OLD NAME (I.E X LTD.). DOES THIS ORDER VALID AS ON THE DATE OF PASSING THE ORDER THERE IS NO COMPANY BY X LTD.
► Read Answer
The assessee during the course of assessment proceeding, even after granting sufficient opportunity by AO was not able to furnish confirmation, bank statement and ITR of depositors from whom unsecured loan was obtained. Accordingly the AO made the addition. Now the assessee before the CIT(A) has made available and produced all the documentary evidences (as above) to substantiate the unsecured loan was genuine. On what grounds, legal arguments and judgements, the appellant should raise in order that the CIT(A) admits the additional evidence now.
► Read Answer
Asst u/s 143(3) was framed by income tax officer ( ITO) for the Asst year 2013-14. Now notice u/s 148 is issued by Deputy commissioner of income tax (DCIT) . Is it valid notice.
► Read Answer
Where does it says that property should be registered property for eligibility of claiming LTCG and how there be discriminations for assessee who are reqularly investing property buying and selling in a cyclic manner where department not even question or verifying whther property bought or sold are registered property under registration act Where as when assesse sold the apartment and deposited LTC in into bank LTCG deposit scheme and while requesting for NOC in form G the lowest level officer ACIT DCIT without applying any mind reopening cases interrupting the various sections and then issuing notices after notices clueless misusing…
► Read Answer
Whether payment made to the tenant for vacating the land in his possession just before its sale is allowable as cost of improvement or expenditure incurred in connection with transfer. Whether the position would be different if the tenant is in the nature of unauthorised occupant of land?
► Read Answer
Assessee sold ancestral agricultural land after converting it to NA in 20-21. Agricultural Land was converted to NA plots in 2016-17. All the plots were sold in one go. For the purpose of calculation of capital gain, while taking cost of acquisition as on 01.04.2001 as per S. 55(2)(b)(i), which SDV is to be taken – applicable to agri. land or NA land as on 01.04.2001? Is it possible to take cost of acquisition as on date when the land was converted to NA?
► Read Answer
In view of newly amended section 9B and Section 45(4) by F.A. 2021, whether there is any difference in terms – Dissolution vis-à-vis reconstitution? Section 9B refers to cases of reconstitution or dissolution whereas; s. 45(4) only refers to reconstitution. Whether the amended section 45(4) is applicable to case of dissolution of firm?
► Read Answer
AfterGhanshyam (HUF>[2009] 315 ITR 1 (SC), it was settled thatinterest received on compensation or enhanced compensation under section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is not taxable being part of enhanced compensation itself Courts /tribunals have decided in favour of assessee on the basis Ghanshyam(HUF) consistently. However, P & H High Court in Mahender Pal Narang v. CBDT [2020] 120 taxmann.com 400 (Punjab & Haryana) decided against the assessee by relying on sections 56(2) and 57 of the 1961 Act. P & H High court while deciding against the assessee, dissented with Gujarat High Court Movaliya Bhikhubhai Balabhai v. ITO(TDS)…
► Read Answer
Is it possible to file an appeal against certain additions and for some other additions approach DRC u/s 245M if all the other conditions of this section are satisfied ?
► Read Answer
Whether professional fee paid to obtain Private Equity is a revenue expenditure?.
► Read Answer
When the assessment order is passed in the old name of the Company . when the name is changed and informed the Assessing Officer , whether the assessment is valid ?