TO MY QN. LAST SENT A FEW DAYS AGO, LOOK FWD FOR YOUR EXPERTS' ANSWER /OPINION ! Admn. WILL YOU PASS ON MY FEED INPUT SUPLLIED VIA A MESSAGE SENT THROUGH FB A FEW MiNUTES ago !?
► Read Answer
Whether clause 44 And 30C of Form 3Cd are applicable for Reporting in 3CD for Asst Year 2022-23.
► Read Answer
*Facts:* 1. Assessee is running a Proprietorship Business of Vendor Payment Services and Gift Cards Processing. FY 2020-21 Turnover was Rs. 96.60 lk. Current year FY 21-22 Turnover is Rs. 13.50 crores. 2. Considering the turnover of previous year – No TDS applicability for Current FY 2021-22 for Section 194C/ 194H and 194J. However, it exceeded Rs. 50 lacs transactions with single parties and hence is covered under Section 194M. 3. Total two parties where the Turnover exceed Rs. 50 Lacs. a. First Party- Availed Gateway Services for vendor payment. This party has its registered domain and known for its…
► Read Answer
Suppose I have ltcg of Rs 1.5 lakhs under section 112a. How to claim a deduction of Rs 1 lakh. In which schedule?
► Read Answer
During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee died and the assessment was made on one of the legal heir of the assessee who filed that he may be taken as legal heir in this case. The assessment was made in the name of legal heir but the demand notice issued in the name of dead peron(assessee) What is the validity of such demand
► Read Answer
Assessee is partnership firm engaged in the business of construction. assessee firm has filed the declaration under IDS for A.Y. 2015-16 and 2016-17 in respect of Income earned during the relevant A.Y. .In the said declaration assessee firm has claimed the credit for payment of advance tax paid prior , however the PCIT has not allowed the credit and considered the IDS declaration as invalid . The assessee firm has filed the WP against denial of credit of advance tax in IDS declaration and the same is pending before the HC. AO has issued the Notice U/SEc. 148 on 30.06.2021…
► Read Answer
Search warrant is issued in the name of Mrs X and her son Y. Mrs X owns Flat no 1 in first floor and her son Mr Y owns Flat no 20 in 3rd floor. Only Flat no 1 is mentioned in the search warrant containing the names of Mrs X and Mr Y. This issue was not contested at the time of search Mr Y was not in the premises at the time of search, summons were issued only to Mrs X and not Mr Y. Now, 153A notices are issued to Mr Y also seeking him to file…
► Read Answer
Dear Sir, A portion of my land which is non agricultural was acquired by the Govt.of Kerela for construction of a bridge in 2017. During this time they had verbally mentioned that this was tax free. They gave me the compensation for the land acquired, but now I am being told that I have pay capital gain tax for this. Can i just ignore this and avoid paying tax for this compulsory acquisition of non agricultural land? This is really unfair that the govt. takes land forcefully from people and then we are forced to pay tax on compensation given…
► Read Answer
Dear Experts I have filed VSVS 2020 scheme for AY 2017-18 and paid all dues, form-4 issued to me, now department ask 25 % surcharge on unexplained money since while preparing the computation of income the surcharge @ 25% not levied and the agriculture income was not considered for rate purpose in computing the tax. A order under section 154/147/142(1) issued to me and demand under section 156 for tax with interest and penalty. I ask to experts that what remedy remain for me, can I challenge this order before Commissioner Appeal or since I have adopted VSVS 2020 then…
► Read Answer
Assessee is an Individual engaged in the retail business and disclosing his income u/SEc. 44AD of the Income tax. Assessee has made the booking of flat with builder. On the basis of some noting on the loose paper found during the course of search with the builder and on the basis of his statement U/Sec. 132(4) about acceptance of On Money from flat holders, Notice U/Sec. 153C was served. Assessee filed returns for 6 A.Y. and asked for the copies of seized papers, statement of builder and opportunity of cross examination. However the opportunity of cross examination the builder does…
► Read Answer