Answers By Expert: Research Team
Assesseee is private limited company. In addition to Remuneration to Directors , Incentive is paid to them on the basis of profit of the company after finalization of audited accounts and immediately Tax is deducted an paid in the month of June every year. Co is received show casue Notice as to why prosecution should not be made on the ground of not deduction tax on monthly basis and delay in payment of same. Company take a stand that since the incentive is link with finalization of accounts , it can not determined the amount of incentive and therfore there…
► Read Answer
FORM 3 ISSUED. HAVING BALANCE IN PD ACCOUNT WITH THE INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT DUE TO CASH SEIZED AND ASSESSMENT MADE. CAN I PAY FROM PD ACCOUNT UNDER DTVSVS.
► Read Answer
Facts Demand raised against the assessee after assessment u/s 143(3) First appeal preferred and order in favour of assessee. Amount refunded by department as no addition sustained for refund as well as demand paid along with interest u/s 244A. appeal preferred by the department against order of CIT appeal before Honourable ITAT Meanwhile assessee settled the dispute under VSVS by paying 50% Now revised form 3 received seeking to recover 244A interest already granted to assessee on earlier interest paid and also seeking to collect 234D interest @ 0.5% from date of refund to date of payment under VSVS. Question…
► Read Answer
Assessee is partnership firm engaged in the business of construction and development of housing project. Assessee firm has filed the Return of Income for AY 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21. While filling the Return of Income as per advice of CA, added back the difference in stamp duty valuation and actual consideration u/sec 43CA of the Act. While making this disallowance, assessee firm has added the difference even though the same is less than 10%. Since the disallowance was huge, assessee firm has uploaded the Return with out making payment of self assessment tax. All the returns are processed u/143(1A) of…
► Read Answer
Sir, Thanks for providing us the updated judgements. Whether these are now not updated, as after April'2021 we are not able to see any update in judgements. Please confirm & clarify
► Read Answer
When Mr A wants to sell a ownership flat received free by him on surrender of tenanted flat at the time of redevelopment . What is its cost and what is period of holding ?
► Read Answer
1.Penalty of Rs.5,00,000 u/s 271(1)(c) was deleted by CIT appeal on the ground that penalty order passed by A.O. was passed after six months u/s 275(1)(a) . 2.The revenue is in appeal before ITAT on the ground that i) The penalty order was received late by CIT ii) The case is covered under exception to small tax effect circular of CBDT para 10(a) iii) Appeal admitted by the High court in quantum case is not relevant since withdrawal application has been filed by the assessee as per Vivad se Vishwas scheme. 3. On behalf of the assessee it was submitted…
► Read Answer
Assessee has purchase flat from developer. During the course of search at the premises of developer one excel sheet was found in which data regarding name of person flat no, agreement value and cash consideration was mentioned. Accountant and developer accepted in the statement recorded that they have collected on money from flat purchasers. Developer went to settlement commission and also submitted about on money as source . Assessing Officer has issued notice u/sec. 153C for 6 years to assessee on this information. Assessee has filed the returns in response to notice U/sec. 153C of the Act and submitted that…
► Read Answer
Please advise the form in appeal can be filed before ITAT against order passed under section 144C of Income Tax Act 1961
► Read Answer
The à declared under IDS but the taxes not paid. Notice U/s 148 issued. The declared amount vin Form 1 is treated as undisclosed income. Kindy guide how to proceed? Regards
► Read Answer
TdS and Prosecution