↓ Skip to Main Content
Queries And Answers
Experts answer queries on all legal issues for free
Main Home
All queries & answers
Ask Any Question On Law For Free
Experts
Ask Your Question
Answers On Topic:
adjoining flats
54/54F
After amendment to the above sections, is it still permissible to buy 2 adjoining flats with a common entrance/kitchen etc because each flat is too small for a person ? any case law after amendment ?
► Read Answer
Search for:
Latest Judgements
Shri Mukesh Agarwal v. UOI & Ors
Ujjawal Kumar Agarwal v. State of Assam
KMG Wires Pvt. Ltd. v. NFAC (Bombay High Court)
Estate Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT
Estate Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT
Latest Articles
Section 194T…. A Viewpoint
Income-tax Act, 2025- Penalties – Chapter XXI – Sections 439 to 472 (Other than Sections 448 and 449 Penalties relating to tax deduction at source) by Dr. K. Shivaram, Senior Advocate.
CORRESPONDING ANALYSIS OF PENALTY PROVISIONS UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT, 2025
PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUSTS AND PTEC IN MAHARASHTRA
When the Portal Goes Beyond the Notified Form – The Curious Case of Form No. 35
Categories
Allied Laws
GST Law
Income-Tax Act
Tax Laws
Recent Posts
KMG Wires Pvt. Ltd. v. NFAC (Bom)(HC) www.itatonline.org
Shri Mukesh Agarwal v. UOI & Ors (Gau)(HC) www.itatonline.org
Ujjawal Kumar Agarwal v. State of Assam (Gau)(HC) www.itatonline.org
PCIT v. N. N. Trading Corporation ( Bom ( HC) www.itatonline .org PCIT v. Relcon Infraprojects Ltd. ( Bom( HC ) www.itatonline .org
Rajkumar Laxminarayan Kanojiya v. DCIT, CPC (Bom)(HC ) www.itatonline .org .
Meta
Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
WordPress.org