Answers On Topic: Assessment
  Assessment proceedings
When Writ petition in High Court, can assessment proceedings completed?


► Read Answer

  Assessment on company converted into company
Private Limited company  applied to ROC for conversion in to LLP and filed board resolution and form No.LLP 1 for name availability and in FEB-2015. The Company has also filed provisional balance sheet as on 31.03.2015 along with Board resolution. to ROC for conversion into LLP. However, Certificate of conversion into LLP received on 05.06.2015 and name of the Private limited was truck off from ROC All the transaction of Private limited company effective from 01.04.2015 was incorporated in LLP books and offered for tax. Assessment of LLP was done U/s.143(3) for AY 2016-2017 where the said fact was disclosed…


► Read Answer

  FILING OF APPEAL AGAINST CPC DEMAND
ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS FOR AY 2018-19 CONDCUTED AND ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED WITH NIL ADDITION, ACCEPTING THE RETURNED INCOME. BY NFAC DELHI. WITH RESPECT TO ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS UNDERTAKEN BY NFAC DELHI, NO COMPUTATION SHEET OR DEMAND NOTICE IS ISSUED. ONLY ASSESSMENT ORDER IS RECEIVED. LATER ON, CPC BANGALORE HAS RAISED DEMAND ON PORTAL AGAINST THE SAID AY ON ACCOUNT OF NON-GRANTING TDS CREDIT. WHAT ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN? IT APPEAL IS REQUIRED TO BE FILED, THEN AGAINST WHICH ORDER, APPEAL SHOULD BE FILED?


► Read Answer

  Limitation to complete assessment u/s 143(3) – A.Y.2019-20
Search & Sezure action u/s 132 was conducted on 19.06.2018. Assessments for the A.Y. 2013-14 to 2018-19 were completed u/s 153A on 14.08.20121. Assessment for the Assessment Year 2019-20 was completed u/s 143(3). The Government has extended date from time to time to complete the assessment u/s 143(3). In the light of extended period what is last date to complete the assessment u/s 143(3) for AO for the Year 2019-20. Kinly inform about latest circular on the subject. It is also requested to please inform whether prior approval to select the case for scrutiny (part priod is searched period) is…


► Read Answer

  Time limit for scrutiny assessment AY 2020-21
Sir, What is the time limit for issuance of notice for fy 2019-20? Will the reduced time limit of three months apply as against the original period of 6 months? Notices u/s 143(2) were already received in few cases before 30-06-2021. Can it be considered that all the notices are issued and no further notices will be issued? Please clarify.


► Read Answer

  Issuing scrutiny notice _ AY 2019-20
Dear sir, Which is the last date to issuing scrutiny notice for AY 2019-20 ? Kind regards, Sameer jain


► Read Answer

  Can the Assessing Officer from Raipur refuse to grant an opportunity of cross examination on the ground that the person who has given statement is resides at Mumbai ?
Case of the assessee was reopened on the basis of third party information. The assesse asked opportunity to cross examination. But the same was rejected by the AO stating "Since the third party is a resident of Mumbai therefore the AO st Raipur is not empowered to issue summons to the above person so as to accord an opportunity of cross examination." Is there any case law in favour of above contention of AO. If yes, kindly quote the same. Also, any case law rejecting the above facts of the AO is welcomed.


► Read Answer

  When the assessment order is passed in the old name of the Company . when the name is changed and informed the Assessing Officer , whether the assessment is valid ?
A NAME OF THE COMPANY WAS CHANGED FROM X LTD TO SAY Y LTD. THE SAID CHANGE WAS INTIMATED TO THE AO DURING THE ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS. THE AO STILL PASSED THE ASSESSMENT ORDER U/S 143(3) IN THE OLD NAME (I.E X LTD.). DOES THIS ORDER VALID AS ON THE DATE OF PASSING THE ORDER THERE IS NO COMPANY BY X LTD.


► Read Answer

  Whether assessment on the basis of notice issued by the Assessing Officer who had no jurisdiction is valid ?
Notice U/s 143(2) issued by ITO wd 20(3)(5), who has no territorial jurisdiction over the assessee for AY 2014-15, actual jurisdiction lies with ITO Wd 19(3)(5), an objection to that effect was filed within 30 days of issue of notice. However ITO 20(3)(5) asked for details time to time and assessee provided whatever the ITO asked for and an order was passed U/s 143(3) with an addition of Rs. 1 cr by disallowing LTCG on shares considering it as bogus.  Assessment was completed without removing objection filed by the assessee for jurisdiction. The assessee is in CIT (A), CIT (A)…


► Read Answer