↓ Skip to Main Content
Queries And Answers
Experts answer queries on all legal issues for free
Main Home
All queries & answers
Ask Any Question On Law For Free
Experts
Ask Your Question
Answers On Topic:
Deduction on actual payment
Whether amendment in section 43B and Section 36(1)(va) are applicable retrospectively ?
Whether these amendments are applicable retospectively or from AY 2022-23 (more…)
► Read Answer
Whether employees contribution towards PF and ESIC paid after due date and before filing of return is allowable as deduction.?
Whether employees contribution towards pf and esi paid after due date as precribed under the prescribed under the law is disallowable u/s 36 of the IT Act, 1961 though paid within due date of filing return as per S43B of the It Act 1961
► Read Answer
Search for:
Latest Judgements
AMISH HARESH KUMAR PARIKH VS ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (ITAT Mumbai)
Sterling Court F wing CO-OP Hsg socy limited vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Dy. CIT v. Ashray Investments (ITAT Mumbai)
Pravinkumar Jethalal Dave v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (Bombay High Court)
Arvindbhai Khatri Sons Designs Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Latest Articles
ITC Reversal Under Rule 42 and 43: Why the GSTR-2B Auto-Reversal Formula Penalises Compliant Taxpayers for Vendor Defaults
An Analysis of Direct Tax Proposals and GST 2026-2027
India’s Union Budget 2026-27
The Direct Tax Code(DTC) 2025: Overall analysis and Key Changes
Budget 2026: Why Income Tax Amendments Will Be Made in the 2025 Act Instead of the Repealed 1961 Law
Categories
Allied Laws
GST Law
Income-Tax Act
Tax Laws
Recent Posts
Dy .CIT v. Ashray Investments ( Mum)( Trib) www.itatonline .org
Pravinkumar Jethalal Dave v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (Bom)(HC) www.itatonline.org .
Arvindbhai Khatri Sons Designs Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (Mum)(Trib) www.itatonline.org .
Shri Mukul Rohatgi v. PCIT (Delhi)(Trib) www.itatonline.org .
Seeta Nayyar v. ACIT ( Mum)( Trib) www.itatonline.org .
Meta
Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
WordPress.org