↓ Skip to Main Content
Queries And Answers
Experts answer queries on all legal issues for free
Main Home
All queries & answers
Ask Any Question On Law For Free
Experts
Ask Your Question
Answers On Topic:
mis reporting
under/mis- reporting
whether ratio of 280 Taxman 334 / 125 taxmann.com 253 (Panji)(FB) ( Bom) (HC) apply to 270A as well ?
► Read Answer
Search for:
Latest Judgements
Buckeye Trust v. PCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
DWARIKA PRASAD vs PRITHVI RAJ SINGH (Supreme Court)
Infantry Security and Facilities through, proprietor Tukaram M. Surayawanshi v. ITO (Bombay High Court)
Rupesh Kantilal Savla v. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Mark Studio India Private Limited vs Income Tax Officer (Madras High Court)
Latest Articles
Reported case laws of Honourable Mr. Justice M. S. Sonak, Bombay, High Court.
What Every Flat Owner Must Know About Redevelopment
Tie Breaker Rule – Analysis thereof for determination of Residential status of an Individual Centre of Vital Interest
FROM JURISDICTIONAL TO FACELESS: NAVIGATING THE CHANGING LANDSCAPES OF INCOME TAX ASSESSMENTS
NOTE ON SUPREME COURT RULING IN RAJEEV BANSAL
Categories
Allied Laws
GST Law
Income-Tax Act
Tax Laws
Recent Posts
Buckeye Trust v.PCIT ( Bang )(Trib) www.itatonline.org .
Infantry Security and Facilities through, proprietor Tukaram M. Surayawanshi v. ITO ( Bom)( HC) www.itatonline.org .
Crompton Greaves Ltd. v. ACIT [2015] 229 Taxman 545 / 275 CTR 49 (Bom) ( HC)
M.N. Navale (Bigger HUF) v. Somnath M. Wajale, Dy.CIT [2015] 57 taxmann.com 5 (Bom)( HC)
Goa Cricket Association v. PCIT [2020] 113 taxmann.com 287 (Bom)(HC) .
Meta
Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
WordPress.org