↓ Skip to Main Content
Queries And Answers Experts answer queries on all legal issues for free
  • Main Home
  • All queries & answers
  • Ask Any Question On Law For Free
  • Experts
Ask Your Question

Answers On Topic: other charges
  What is the GST rate on Development and other charges collected for developers for 5% afforable scheme


► Read Answer

Latest Judgements

  • Manugraph India Ltd. v. ACIT
  • Manugraph India Ltd. v. ACIT
  • Manugraph India Ltd. v. ACIT
  • Sameena Shamsuddin Sayed v. ITO
  • RK & Company Manpower Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)

Latest Articles

  • Penalty Provisions, immunity provisions along with Decriminalization of certain Prosecution Provisions of the Income- Tax Act, 2025
  • Direct Taxes – Amendments to the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Act, 2015 (Black Money Act) Disclosure Scheme for Small Taxpayers & Relaxed Prosecution
  • Direct Taxes – Penalty on misreporting/underreporting transactions of Crypto Asset
  • Direct Taxes – Repeal & Saving clauses
  • Prosecution Provisions – Income Tax Act, 1961 and Income Tax Act, 2025

Categories

  • Allied Laws
  • GST Law
  • Income-Tax Act
  • Tax Laws

Recent Posts

  • National Co-Operative Development Corporation v. ACIT (2026) 484 ITR 193/ 308 Taxman 168 / 348 CTR 83 (SC) Editorial : Editorial : National Co-operative Development Corporation v. ACIT [2012] 204 Taxman 6 /[2013] 356 ITR 184 (Delhi) (HC) affirmed.
  • DIT (IT) v. American Express Bank Ltd. (2026) 484 ITR 137/ 308 Taxman 246 / 348 CTR 38 / 256 DTR 497 (SC) DIT(IT) v. Oman International Bank S.A. O.G (Now Doha Bank) 2026) 484 ITR 137/ 308 Taxman 246 / 348 CTR 38 / 256 DTR 497 (SC) Editorial : CIT v. Emirates Commercial Bank Ltd. [2003] 262 ITR 55/[2004] 134 Taxman 682 (Bom) (HC) disapproved. DIT (IT) v. American Express Bank Ltd. [IT Appeal No. 1294 of 2013, dated 1-4-2015(Bom)(HC) set aside
  • CIT v. Umang Agarwal [2025] 173 taxmann.com 541 / (2026) 484 ITR 87 (All)(HC) Editorial : CIT v. Umang Agarwal (2014) 365 ITR 164 (All)(HC), observation, explained.
  • Jindal Equipment Leasing Consultancy Services Ltd. v. CIT (2026) 484 ITR 641/ 309 Taxman 2 (SC) Nalwa Investment Ltd. CIT (2026) 484 ITR 641/ 309 Taxman 2 (SC) Abhinandan Tradex Ltd. CIT (2026) 484 ITR 641/ 309 Taxman 2 (SC) Mansarover Tradex Ltd. CIT (2026) 484 ITR 641/ 309 Taxman 2 (SC) Editorial : CIT v. Nalwa Investment Ltd (2020) 427 ITR 229 (Delhi)(HC), affirmed.
  • Sanjay Garg v. Williamson Financial Services Ltd and CIT [2025] 178 taxmann.com 220 / (2026) 484 ITR 400(Gauhati)(HC) Dr. Maish Board v. Williamson Financial Services Ltd and CIT [2025] 178 taxmann.com 220 / (2026) 484 ITR 400(Gauhati)(HC) Editorial : Williamson Financial Services Ltd. v. CIT, (2025) 482 ITR 628 (Gauhati)(HC)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
    © 2026 The contents of this document are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or a formal recommendation. While due care has been taken in preparing this document, the existence of mistakes and omissions herein is not ruled out. Neither the author nor itatonline.org and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any inaccurate or incomplete information in this document nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. No part of this document should be distributed or copied (except for personal, non-commercial use) without express written permission of itatonline.org.