Answers On Topic: Reassessment
  Jurisdictional Assessing Officer for issuing notice u/s 148 of I T Act
In case of assessee,  there was no assessment u/s 143(3) of I T Act for ay 11-12.  There was only intimation us 143(1) from CPC. Under such circumstances who will be the jurisdictional assessing officer for issuing notice u/s 148 in March 2018 ?  Whether erstwhile JAO for ay 11-12 or assessing officer having charge over assessee on the day of issuing notice on the basis of income criteria or any other criteria? Please guide.


► Read Answer

  Send us the copy of Judgment on reassessment , in CIT v. Smithkline Beecham Consumer Brands Ltd. (2003) 126 Taxman 104 (Chd.) (Mag.).
Need a case law of CIT v. Smithkline Beecham Consumer Brands Ltd. (2003) 126 Taxman 104 (Chd.) (Mag.).


► Read Answer

  Re-assessment Proceedings/ Double Taxation. Applicability of section 153C
Assessment for A.Y 2012-13 was reopened by issuing notice U/S 148 on the allegation that the assessee has received Bogus commodity profit through banking channel and passed on cash as per statement of broker. The assessee had shown the profit on commodity and offered the same for taxation in the original return and also in the return filed in response to 148 notice. No deduction from the aforesaid income was claimed. Apart from various legal grounds of appeal one of the ground is , since the income has already been offered to taxation the addition of the same again on…


► Read Answer

  Return in response to notice u/s 148 , 147 , whether agreed addition to be included
Sir, The  assessment completed u/s 143(3) with agreed additions was re opened u/s 147 , while filing return in response to notice u/s 148, whether agreed additions made to returned income , to be included in  taxable income ? If so,  whether revised  financial statements incorporating the addition is to be filed?  please advice.


► Read Answer

  Section 151 . Sanction for issue of notice – Who will be approving authority u/s 151 i.e. JCIT or CIT, considering the extension granted time to time due to Covid Pandemics.
Notice u/s 148 for ay 15-16 received 0n 25/03/2021.  Who will be approving authority u/s 151  i.e. JCIT or CIT,  considering the extension granted time to time due to Covid Pandemics.


► Read Answer

  Section 148 notice time limit & applicability of section 148A
A query was answered by Adv.Advocate Aditya Ajgonkar The Ld. advocate stated that the last date for issue notice u/s 148 was extended to 30.06.2021 but section 148A is also effective from 01.04.2021. My query is that section 148 has been extended as if Finance Act 2021 was not passed hence extended upto 31.03.2022. Similarly, application of section 148A is also deferred till 31.03.2020. Can you pl confirm & provide notification Nos>


► Read Answer

  Whether reassessment notice issued by Deputy Commissioner of Income tax is valid ?
Asst u/s 143(3) was framed by income tax officer ( ITO) for the Asst year 2013-14. Now notice u/s 148 is issued by Deputy commissioner of income tax (DCIT) . Is it valid notice.


► Read Answer

  Whether issue of reassessment notice is valid merely on the ground that property sold was not registered ?
Where does it says that property should be registered property for eligibility of claiming LTCG and how there be discriminations for assessee who are reqularly investing property buying and selling in a cyclic manner where department not even question or verifying whther property bought or sold are registered property under registration act Where as when assesse sold the apartment and deposited LTC in into bank LTCG deposit scheme and while requesting for NOC in form G the lowest level officer ACIT DCIT without applying any mind reopening cases interrupting the various sections and then issuing notices after notices clueless misusing…


► Read Answer

  Whether issue of Notice u/s.148 on the basis of information received from the Bank is valid ?
Client have  44AD income for A.Y. 14-15. Turnover declarared Rs. 35 Lakh in return. REason to believe stated as " Bank has given information that total Credit sum in Bank account is 56 Lakh and turnover declared is 35 lakh, difference remains to be unexplained ".   Question : 1. Whether above reason to believe is correct as given by AO. As the same is just took from AIR and given to us. and also same details was already available 6 years back, why not 143(2) was issued at that moment of time...so it is change of opinion just. kindly…


► Read Answer