Assessee is an individual and his assessment U/Sec. 143(3) was completed for A_Y. 2016-17. Later on it was reopened U/Sec 147 on the ground that claim of Interest paid and allowed as deudction U/Sec 56 and assessment was completed U/Sec. 147 r.w.s. 143 (3) Assessing at same income which was earlier accepted U/sec 143(3). Again Notice U/Sec. 263 was issued on the ground that claim of interest paid and allowed by the AO is incorrect and therefore order is erroneous and prejudicial to the int of revenue and without appreciation of submission passed the order U/sec. 263 holding order passed…
► Read Answer
Sir, The return was Originally Processed U/s 143(1). Time limit for revision has elapsed. Assessee has filed his return in wrong Form i.e. in ITR 4 instead of ITR-3 and by mistake has not disclosed his information regarding his Directorships and Shareholdings in his private limited companies, moreover some TDS credit claims were not made in the return, though the Income was properly disclosed. Rectification could not be filed. My Question is:- What remedy do the assessee has for claiming his TDS credits, which was not been claimed at all in his Original Return ? Whether the assessee can file…
► Read Answer
Dear All, I have one query: The assessment Unit of The Income Tax Department has passed order U/s 147 read with section 144 for the A.Y. 2018-19. While making assessment U/s 144, the credit of Tax deducted at Source (TDS) has not been given by the assessment unit. As a result, there is increase in income tax demand to the tune of TDS and thus interest U/s 234a is charged on total tax liability. How to apply for rectification of such order? Only Rectification of intimation U/s 143(1) can be applied for through Income Tax Portal. Appeal to CIT Appeals…
► Read Answer
The Assessee wrongly quoted the TAN in her return for the financial year 2013-14. Demand raised under sec 143-1 for the said financial year in Aug 2015. Now only she notices the demand but eight years have already passed. Now, she could not file any rectification or revision. What is the way out? Should she file the petition under sec 264?
► Read Answer
Dear Sir, Order passed by the Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department for AY 2018-19 and a Demand of Rs. 12 Lakh raised, notice of demand u/s 156 issued. Assessee is a retired employee and did not file his return for AY 2018-19. The assessee could not response to any notices issued by the Department till date as he is diagnosed with Cancer and his consultant did not inform him of the notices. My query is whether apart from revision of order u/s 264 or appeal before CIT(A), any other options available so that he can submit his responses and file…
► Read Answer
Assessee is trust registered Bombay Public trust Act and running a school and is not receiving any grant from GOVt. Filed the Return of income for AY. 2018-19. INTIMATION u/Sec. 143(1) is received where entire Gross receipts were considered as taxable at MMR and later on case was selected for scrutiny , where AO assessed the income as determined by the CPC U/Sec. 143(1)(a). Assessee filed an appeal against the assessment order passed U/Sec. 143(3) . NOW PCIT has issued NOtice U/sec. 263 on the ground that no question was asked to assessee about it's claim U/Sec. 10(23) and no…
► Read Answer
If the assessee has filed an appeal before CIT. But now assessee has to file application for revision of order under section 264. Can assessee can do so? As withdrawal of appeal is not allowed and as per section 264(4) assessee cannot file application for revision of order if his appeal is pending before CIT(A)
► Read Answer
After ITAT quashed order u/s 263 passed by pcit , AO issues notice u/s 154 on same point, what can be the remedy with Assessee? Does it partake contempt of order of ITAT ? any case law?
► Read Answer
Can AO issue notice i/s 148A when notice u/s 263 is pending on same point ?
► Read Answer
PF/ESI deposited after due dates of respective Acts but before due date of filing ITR for A.Y. prior to A.Y. 21-22. Jurisdictional ITAT, Indore Bench consistently deleted the additions made on the above issue, holding that amendments made by Finance Bill 2021 on the above issues are not applicable before 31.03.2021. No subsequent order of Jurisdictional High Court of MP Revision u/s 264 filed before Jurisdictional P.C.I.T. Indore. Query Whether the order of Jurisdictional ITAT are binding in Revision u/s 264? Whether different view can be taken? Citation Please Thanks & Regards
► Read Answer
Sec. 263 of the Act .