Assessee is an individual and regular in filling his return of income. Assessee has received the Notice U/Sec.153C for A.Y. 2019-20 and preceding 6 years on the basis of noting on the seized papers found during the course of search with the Developer from whom assessee has purchased the flat and statement given by the CFO of the developer U/SEc.132(4) of the Act that noting on seized paper is cash component in the transaction of purchase of flat and assessee has also accepted that said amount as on Money in the application made before the settlement commission and therefore the…
► Read Answer
Assessee is pvt limited co engaged in business of manufacturing of engaged goods. Had supplied to a customer X . Search u/Sec. 132 carried out at X . During search digital in form of excel sheet was found n seized. On the basis of certain noting , CFO of X has agreed n given statement that X has pratice of recording 30% of material purchase from supplier in cash and not recorded in the books. On the basis of this admission CFo also stated that from assessee co X had effected transcation in cash of Rs. 3.5 Cr which is…
► Read Answer
Can AO issue notice u/s 153C after he realised that notice u/s 153A was invalid due to lack of search warrant on Assessee ?
► Read Answer
Assessee is private limited co and engaged in business of manufacturing of spare parts of vehicles etc. Search U/Sec. 132 has conducted on the ground that assesssee has effected the purchases from the parties which are only providing accomodation bills and there GST numbers were cancelled subsequently due their involvement in issuing fake invoices. During the course of assessement proceedings assessee submits that it purchases are genuine and duly supported by all evidences such as invoice, material inwards note, payments by banking channel, transport receipts. When the asssessee effected purchases the supplier GST number was valid and same was also…
► Read Answer
before amendment in 2020, 2 sections , notices u/s 153C and 148 had been issued without proper jurisdiction. whether issue of one in the place of other makes order of asst void or liable to curable defect?
► Read Answer
Search conducted from unknown party, excel sheet found and some data found in that excel sheet regarding my property. AO can make addition on that basis
► Read Answer
In the present case for AY 2016-17, notice u/s 148 dt. 31/3/21 received through email on 1/4/21. Reassessment order dt. 31/3/22 passed appeal filed before CIT (A) on 9/4/22. Again notice u/s 148A(b) issued on 2/6/22 (stated as issued, as per the direction of SC decision in the case of Ashish Agarwal) along with the information and material (12 pages missing/3 pages not legible) relied upon for such reopening. The above information is received by the AO from the INSIGHT PORTAL, as flagged by the system as HIGH RISK CRIU/VRU. Now the AO has issued order u/s 148A(d) & notice…
► Read Answer
I got Summon notice From income tax department under section 131(1A) by india post but i search income tax website but notice not showing Genuine
► Read Answer
Assessee is an individual. during the course of search with his brother and his companies on Aug.2013 following documents were found . a. Cash deposit slip about deposit of cash 1050000/- by the said co. b. Gift deed for gift of shares in Pvt. limited co by the assessee to his father. and other relatives were found. on the basis of these documents Notice U/Sec.153C was issued in jan 2016 for A.Y. 2008-09 to 2013-14. while recording the satisfaction the AO has stated that from verification of seized documents it reveals that assessee has certain undisclosed income for the A.Y.…
► Read Answer
DURING THE COURSE OF SEARCH AT ASSESSEE'S PREMISE (LET SAY ABC PVT LTD BEING A JEWELLER), CERTAIN INFORMATION WAS EXTRACTED FROM COMPUTER/HARDISK SEIZED WHEREIN IT WAS MENTIONED IN EXCEL FILE - DETAILS OF OTHER PERSON (SAY XYZ), HIS ADDRESS, DATE OF CASH RECEIPT FROM XYZ FOR PURCHASE OF JEWELRY. IT WAS A EXCEL DOCUMENT AND DID NOT CONTAIN ANY SIGNATURE. 2. CONSIDERING THE ABOVE EXCEL FILE EXTRACTED AS INCRIMINATING MATERIAL PERTAINING TO OTHER PERSON (XYZ), ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS U/S 153(C) WERE UNDERTAKEN OF XYZ. XYZ HAD CLEARLY DENIED SUCH INFORMATION AND TAKEN STAND THAT HE HAS NOT PURCHASED ANY SUCH JEWELRY…
► Read Answer
153C proceedings