Ramasamy Sathyan v. ACIT (2024) 230 TTJ 889 / 240 DTR 377 /38 NYPTTJ 793 / 163 taxmann.com 519 (Chennai)(Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Unsigned assessment and non-service of order-Physical copy was signed-Up loaded unsigned copy-Revision is valid.[S. 143(3), 153C]

Held that the Principal CIT has  examined the assessment record and on his satisfaction invoked the jurisdiction under the Act. The contention raised by the Authorised Representative, whether it is unsigned copy of assessment order in ITBA portal and for non-service is immaterial for initiation of the proceedings under s. 263 as this Tribunal has found  signed assessment order dt. 27th Dec., 2019 while examining the assessment records. Revision  order is up held.  (AY. 2018-19)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*