Tribunal held that cash deposits during Demonetisation period in respect of retail sale of petroleum products revision is not justified it is not practicable to maintain customer-specific records. When the Assessing Officer having discretion in examination of transactions and level of inquiry. Order cannot be erroneous. As regards Audit report available for download and examination. Assessing Officer’s choice not to download and file copy for record not prejudicial to interests of revenue. As regards cash gift from mother and the assessee failed to explain the source and creditors confirmations were incomplete and deficient. PCIT is justified in setting aside assessment order. (AY. 2017-18)
Ravi Sher Singh Toor v. PCIT (2024) 110 ITR 218 (Chd)(Trib)
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Cash deposits-Demonetisation-Sales-Retail sale of petroleum products, customer-specific records not practicable-Assessing Officer having discretion in examination of transactions and level of inquiry-Audit report available for download and examination-Assessing Officer’s choice not to download and file copy for record not prejudicial to interests of revenue-Order is not erroneous-Cash gift from mother-Failure to explain the source-Creditors-Confirmations incomplete and deficient PCIT is justified in setting aside assessment order.[S. 68, 147 148]
Leave a Reply