Samsung India Electronics (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 302 Taxman 537 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 254(2A): Appellate Tribunal-Stay-No coercive or precipitative steps had been taken by revenue-Stay petition cannot be dismissed as premature-Matter remanded to the Tribunal to decide on merits. [S. 92C, Art.226]

Assessee filed an appeal before the  Tribunal and  also  filed stay application seeking stay of outstanding demand. Tribunal dismissed the stay application on ground that stay  application was premature.  On writ the Court  set aside  dismissal of the  stay application and directed the Tribunal to decide on merits. (AY. 2021-22)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*