Dismissing the petition the court held that when the assessee himself has given multiple e-mail ids and assessee has responded to the notice issued on its latest e-mail id on which several communications for hearing of the appeal were issued, it cannot be held that the assessee was not afforded opportunity of hearing by the appella authority before passing the impugned orders. Court held that the petitioner may file an appeal before the Tribunal, if so advised. (AY-2011-12 to 2014-15)
Sham Basheer v. CIT (A) (2024) 340 CTR 742 / 240 DTR 219 (Ker)((HC) Editorial : Order of single judge is set aside, Sham Basheer v. CIT (A).(2024) 340 CTR 739 / 240 DTR 217 (Ker)(HC)
S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Multiple e-mail id-Opportunity of being heard-Primary and email id-Notices were sent email-Responded by the assessee-Opportunity of hearing was given-Writ petition is dismissed. [S. 254(1) Art. 226]
Leave a Reply