The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the assessee’s grounds relating to disallowance under section 40(a)(i) without discussing the applicability of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement or sections 9 and 195. The Tribunal held that section 250(6) mandates a reasoned and speaking order. The non-speaking order violated the principles of natural justice and the matter was restored to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication. (AY. 2017-18 & 2018-19).
SLK Software (P.) Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 127 ITR 395 (Bang.)(Trib.)
S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure–Speaking order-Failure to deal with contentions-Matter remanded.[S. 40(a)(i), 250(6)]
Leave a Reply