SRS Mining v. UOI (2022) 328 CTR 510 / 217 DTR 321 /141 taxmann.com 272 (Mad.)(HC): Notice is issued in SLP filed by the Revenue , ACIT v. SRS Mining (2023) 294 Taxman 604 (SC)

S. 132 : Search and seizure-Authorisation-Authorization for search should be of competent authority and it is on satisfaction of authority that search warrant can be issued and it can be only of Competent Officer-Where search warrant was not issued by Competent Officer, it would vitiate search-Matter remanded. [Art. 226]

Court held that authorization for search should be of competent authority and it is on satisfaction of authority that search warrant can be issued and it can be only of Competent Officer. Where search warrant was not issued by Competent Officer, it would vitiate search. Matter was  remanded back to Assessing Authority for adjudication afresh. (AY.  2014-15 to 2017-18)