↓ Skip to Main Content
Digest of case laws Online digest of latest case laws
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Ask Your Query
  • Cause List
  • Digest
  • Info
  • Judgements
  • Upload Your Articles & Judgements
  • Others
    • Articles (Old)
    • Asson News
    • Blog
    • Feedback
    • Forum
    • Judgements (Old)
    • Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme Q&A
Home › Income-Tax Act › Subex Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022)448 ITR 309 (Karn.)(HC)

Subex Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022)448 ITR 309 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 10AA : Special Economic Zones-Computation of turnover-Telecommunication expenses not to be excluded from export turnover.

Held that  the Tribunal was not right in holding that the telecommunication expenses were to be excluded from export turnover in computing deduction under section 10AA. (AY.2009-10)

‹ New Noble Educational Society v. CCIT (2022) 448 ITR 594 / 219 DTR 89 / 329 CTR 137 / 143 taxmann.com 276 (2023) 290 Taxman 206 (SC) St. Augustine Educational Society v. CCIT (2022) 448 ITR 594 / 219 DTR 89 / 329 CTR 137 (SC) St. Patrick Educational Society (2022) 448 ITR 594 / 219 DTR 89 / 329 CTR 137 (SC) Sri Koundinya Education Society (2022) 448 ITR 594 / 219 DTR 89 / 329 CTR 137 (SC) R.R.M. Education Society (2022) 448 ITR 594 / 219 DTR 89 / 329 CTR 137 (SC)
CIT. v. Ghaziabad Development Authority (2022) 448 ITR 342 (All)(HC) CIT v. Aligarh Development Authority (2022)448 ITR 342 (All) (HC) CIT v. Haridwar Development Authority (2022)448 ITR 342 (All) (HC).Editorial: SLP of Revenue dismissed , CIT (E) v. Ghaziabad Development Authority (2023)454 ITR 803/ 293 Taxman 449 (SC)/Refer ( 2023) 293 Taxman 171 ( SC) ›

Latest Judgements

  • Rahul Purswani vs. ITO (ITAT Pune)
  • Omkara Diamonds Exports Pvt Ltd v. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  • PCIT v. Sarah Faisal Hawa (Bombay High Court)
  • Babita Chelawat vs. DCIT (ITAT Indore)
  • Sanjay Shantilal Dave v. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department (ITAT Mumbai)

Latest Articles

  • Direct Taxes – Amendments to the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Act, 2015 (Black Money Act) Disclosure Scheme for Small Taxpayers & Relaxed Prosecution
  • Direct Taxes – Penalty on misreporting/underreporting transactions of Crypto Asset
  • Direct Taxes – Repeal & Saving clauses
  • Prosecution Provisions – Income Tax Act, 1961 and Income Tax Act, 2025
  • Proposed amendments relating to Reassessment

Categories

  • Allied Laws
  • GST Law
  • Income-Tax Act
  • Tax Laws

Recent Posts

  • Solaimalai Kumari v. State through Income Tax Department (2025) 347 CTR 885 / 254 DTR 468 (Mad)(HC)
  • Harish Chadha v. State (2025) 347 CTR 163 / 305 Taxman 473 (Delhi)(HC)
  • PCIT v. Thapar Homes (P) Ltd. (2025) 347 CTR 184 / 256 DTR 144 (Delhi)
  • Chhattisgarh Steel Castings (P) Ltd. v PCIT (2025) 347 CTR 857 / 255 DTR 408 / 306 Taxman 28 (Chhattisgarh)(HC) Editorial :Chhattisgarh Steel Castings (P) Ltd. v CIT (2025) 304 Taxman 447 / 347 CTR 861 / 255 DTR 412 (Chhattisgarh) 412 affirmed.
  • CIT v. Pancard Clubs Ltd. (2025) 180 taxmann.com 529/ 347 CTR 672 / 256 DTR 180 (SC) Editorial : CIT v. Pancard Clubs Ltd(2014) 226 Taxman 141/ 272 CTR 257 /(2015) 370 ITR 45 (Bom)(HC)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
    © 2026 The contents of this document are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or a formal recommendation. While due care has been taken in preparing this document, the existence of mistakes and omissions herein is not ruled out. Neither the author nor itatonline.org and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any inaccurate or incomplete information in this document nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. No part of this document should be distributed or copied (except for personal, non-commercial use) without express written permission of itatonline.org.

    Discover more from Digest of case laws

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading