↓ Skip to Main Content
Digest of case laws Online digest of latest case laws
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Ask Your Query
  • Cause List
  • Digest
  • Info
  • Judgements
  • Upload Your Articles & Judgements
  • Others
    • Articles (Old)
    • Asson News
    • Blog
    • Feedback
    • Forum
    • Judgements (Old)
    • Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme Q&A
Home › Income-Tax Act › Subex Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022)448 ITR 309 (Karn.)(HC)

Subex Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2022)448 ITR 309 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 10AA : Special Economic Zones-Computation of turnover-Telecommunication expenses not to be excluded from export turnover.

Held that  the Tribunal was not right in holding that the telecommunication expenses were to be excluded from export turnover in computing deduction under section 10AA. (AY.2009-10)

‹ New Noble Educational Society v. CCIT (2022) 448 ITR 594 / 219 DTR 89 / 329 CTR 137 / 143 taxmann.com 276 (2023) 290 Taxman 206 (SC) St. Augustine Educational Society v. CCIT (2022) 448 ITR 594 / 219 DTR 89 / 329 CTR 137 (SC) St. Patrick Educational Society (2022) 448 ITR 594 / 219 DTR 89 / 329 CTR 137 (SC) Sri Koundinya Education Society (2022) 448 ITR 594 / 219 DTR 89 / 329 CTR 137 (SC) R.R.M. Education Society (2022) 448 ITR 594 / 219 DTR 89 / 329 CTR 137 (SC)
CIT. v. Ghaziabad Development Authority (2022) 448 ITR 342 (All)(HC) CIT v. Aligarh Development Authority (2022)448 ITR 342 (All) (HC) CIT v. Haridwar Development Authority (2022)448 ITR 342 (All) (HC).Editorial: SLP of Revenue dismissed , CIT (E) v. Ghaziabad Development Authority (2023)454 ITR 803/ 293 Taxman 449 (SC)/Refer ( 2023) 293 Taxman 171 ( SC) ›

Latest Judgements

  • Vinay Tarachand Chawla vs PCIT [ITA 3371/Mum/2025] (ITAT Mumbai)
  • Arham Star v. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
  • Deepak Jain v. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
  • ACIT v. Eagle Films (ITAT Mumbai)
  • Abdul Mannan v. ITO (CALCUTTA HIGH COURT)

Latest Articles

  • Section 194T…. A Viewpoint
  • Income-tax Act, 2025- Penalties – Chapter XXI – Sections 439 to 472 (Other than Sections 448 and 449 Penalties relating to tax deduction at source) by Dr. K. Shivaram, Senior Advocate.
  • CORRESPONDING ANALYSIS OF PENALTY PROVISIONS UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT, 2025
  • PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUSTS AND PTEC IN MAHARASHTRA
  • When the Portal Goes Beyond the Notified Form – The Curious Case of Form No. 35

Categories

  • Allied Laws
  • GST Law
  • Income-Tax Act
  • Tax Laws

Recent Posts

  • Santosh Bhadoriya. v. UOI (2025) 467 ITR 467 (MP)(HC)
  • Domino Printing Sciences plc. v. CIT (2025) 476 ITR 372 /174 taxmann.com 865 (Delhi)(HC)
  • NRA Iron and Steel Pvt. Ltd v.ITO (2025) 476 ITR 13 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : Refer, PCIT v. NRA Iron and Steel Pvt. Ltd (2019) 412 ITR 161 (SC)/ PCIT v. NRA Iron and Steel Pvt. Ltd (2019) 419 ITR 449 (SC), NRA Iron and Steel Pvt. Ltd v.PCIT (2020) 11 SCC 722/ 2020 SCC OnLine SC 319
  • ITD v. Vishweshwara Rao Chava. (2025) 476 ITR 599/304 Taxman 66 (Karn)(HC)
  • Aroh Foundation v. CIT [2024] 159 taxmann.com 608/ (2025) 476 ITR 489 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue dismissed, CIT (E) v. Aroh Foundation. (2025) 304 Taxman 600/ 476 ITR 504 (SC)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
    © 2025 The contents of this document are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or a formal recommendation. While due care has been taken in preparing this document, the existence of mistakes and omissions herein is not ruled out. Neither the author nor itatonline.org and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any inaccurate or incomplete information in this document nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. No part of this document should be distributed or copied (except for personal, non-commercial use) without express written permission of itatonline.org.

    Discover more from Digest of case laws

    Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

    Continue reading