Sundaram Finance Ltd v. ACIT (2018) 403 ITR 407 / 170 DTR 8 /304 CTR 846 / 93 taxman.com 250 (Mad) (HC)Editorial: SLP of assessee is dismissed , Sundaram Finance Ltd v. Dy.CIT ( 2018) 259 Taxman 220 ( SC)

S.271(1)( c):Penalty — Concealment of income — Depreciation -Notice did not show nature of default – Assessee had understood purport and import of notice- Levy of penalty is held to be valid .[ S. 32 , 274 ]

Dismissing the appeal of the assessee  the Court held that; the claiming the depreciation on machinery which did not exist was held to be filing inaccurate particulars of income . When the claim  of depreciation was confronted with the findings it had voluntarily reversed the  claim of depreciation . As regards notice did not show the nature of default , the Court held that when the assessee had understood purport and import of notice , levy of penalty is held to be valid  ( AY.1994-95, 1995-96 )

2 comments on “Sundaram Finance Ltd v. ACIT (2018) 403 ITR 407 / 170 DTR 8 /304 CTR 846 / 93 taxman.com 250 (Mad) (HC)Editorial: SLP of assessee is dismissed , Sundaram Finance Ltd v. Dy.CIT ( 2018) 259 Taxman 220 ( SC)
  1. pradeep says:

    User friendly search utility.

  2. pradeep says:

    user friendly.