Tribunal admitted the additional ground on jurisdiction. The Tribunal held that the assessee is a non-resident Indian according to his permanent account number profile. The Assessing Officer, not knowing the status of the assessee, had assumed jurisdiction. The faceless assessing unit had made a request to transfer the case from them because it was the case of a non-resident individual, who could be assessed only at the international charge. As a result, the ITO at Ajmer had no jurisdiction to issue the notice under section 148. Accordingly the notice and the consequential assessment order is quashed. (AY.2018-19)
Sunil Chablani v. CIT (IT) (2024)116 ITR 187 (Jaipur)(Trib)
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Non-Resident-Jurisdiction Of Assessing Officer-Additional ground-Admitted-Reassessment notice and consequential order is quashed.[S. 69, 143(3), 144C, 147]
Leave a Reply