Thank You
Thank you for your question. We will forward it to an expert in our panel. The experts opinion will be made available shortly. Please visit the main page after some time to read the answer to your question.
invocation of section 56(2)(x) | |
---|---|
Excerpt of query: | the assessee company had booked a flat in feb 2011 for an agreed consideration of Rs 180.00 lacs . only booking form and allotment letter was executed and a sum of Rs 25.00 lacs was paid in Feb 2011. subsequently the project went into litigation and due to development rules constraint the project was delayed and final agreement was executed in registered in sep 2017. the stamp duty valuation is Rs 250.00 lacs. The AO is seeking to tax the difference in the agreed value and the stamp duty valuation u/s 56(2)(x), though the assessee is seeking refuge in the proviso to the section 56(2)(x) as payment vide banking mode has been made pursuant to the booking cum allotment form. Is the AO justified in taxing the differential amount? |
HUF | |
---|---|
Excerpt of query: | In an HUF account, if a co-parcerner passes away, I have 2 queries: 1) Are his wife & daughter entitled to his share in the HUF? 2) Can the Karta of the HUF decide how to distribute the deceased co-parcerner’s share? |
Situation of genuine hardship justifying waiver of fee charged under section 234 E of income tax act 1961 regarding | |
---|---|
Excerpt of query: | Dear Sir Kindly let me know the status of this CBDT Letter No. F.No 275 / 27 / 2013 – IT (B) dt. 2.8.2016 Regards, Hema |
TDS from dividends U/s.206AA | |
---|---|
Excerpt of query: | From FY 2020-21, dividends declared by Indian companies have become taxable and the companies are required to deduct tax at source from such payment. However, in many cases, especially where shares are held in physical form, the shareholders could not furnish the PAN number timely and consequently, the companies have deducted the tax u/s. 206AA of the Income tax Act, 1961. Now the tds so deducted is not appearing in Form 26AS and hence, the shareholder is not able to claim credit of the tds amount. This is despite subsequently intimating the PAN to the Company and requesting for uploading the same on income tax website. Whether the tds so deducted is lost and gone for the shareholder? Is any procedure prescribed by CBDT to claim such tds? Thanks in advance. |
Interest u/s 234A | |
---|---|
Excerpt of query: | Whether Interest u/s 234A will be liable where entire tax has been paid before due date but 234E had to be paid when filing the return after due date and hence there was a shortfall to the extent of 234E. Also kindly enlighten whether 234A will be applicable on the shortfall only. |
TDS on software payment | |
---|---|
Excerpt of query: | An Indian company pays to a Singapore company license fees for purchase of software which is loaded on to chips procured from outside India. The embedded chip is used in SIM card which is sold to various institutions. The relevant portion of software license agreement with Singapore co is re produced below: License Grant 1) Against Payment Of the associated license fee, the xx Singapore company hereby grant the Licensee a non-exclusive (save as may be stated to the contrary in Annex E) and non-transferable license to use the xxxxx Product Software and Documentation or any portion thereof to manufacture a-Product for the duration of this Agreement. This license shall also include the right for the Licensee to have Products manufactured by its Agents, In which case the Licensee shall be obliged to procure its best reasonable endeavors (which shall include the obligation to make adequate provisions in agreements and institute proceedings in term thereof) to ensure that such Agents shall not do anything which would result in the Licensee being in default of any of the provisions of this Agreement. (emphasis supplied by me) 2) Once a Product is manufactured, the Licensee shall have a transferable (Only to the extent that the Licensee may sell or have sold, distribute or have distributed and otherwise dispose of or have disposed of or have disposed of Products to its customers), perpetual and irrevocable license to operate the relevant copy of the xxxxx Product Software on the relevant Product that it was loaded onto. (emphasis supplied by me) 3) xx Singapore co hereby grants the Licensee, for the duration of this Agreement only, a fully transferable license to load the xxxxx Optional Software onto Chips, provided that the Licensee makes payment to xx Singapore co of the associated license fee. For the avoidance of doubt, such license shall include the right for the Licensee’s Subsidiaries to allow their customers to load the xxxxx Optional Software, which customers can in turn transfer that right to their customers etc. The Licensee (or its Agents and customers) then shall have a perpetual, transferable and irrevocable license to use the xxxxx Optional Software so loaded to the extent required to operate the relevant Product. (emphasis supplied by me) 4) Products may be supplied to the Licensee’s customers globally, subject to any exclusions as defined in Annex E. 5) The Licensee may translate or otherwise modify and/or redesign the Documentation in order that the Products can be sold as the Licensee’s products. Licensee and Distributors shall not be obligated to use or reproduce any xxxxx Intellectual Property Rights’ notices Contained in the Documentation, and Licensee and Distributors may remove any intellectual Property Rights’ notices Contained in the Documentation. xx Singapore co will however always retain all copyright in and intellectual Property Right in and to its Documentation. (emphasis supplied by me) 6) The xxxxx Software is owned exclusively by xx Singapore company and consists of proprietary code developed by xx Singapore co which is and shall remain the exclusive property of xx Singapore co and the Licensee shall have no rights therein except as expressly set out in this Agreement. (emphasis supplied by me) 7) When the licensee wishes to manufacture a product it shall place an order on xx Singapore co for the corresponding number of licenses or chips that are required in terms of clause (1) or (3) as the case may be. The decision as to whether or not the licensee orders licenses or chips from Singapore co shall be at Singapore co discretion. (emphasis supplied by me) In brief, the singapore company has IPR of a particular software which is embedded on to chip used in the SIM card dealt in by the Indian company. The Singapore company is the final authority as to whether to supply chips embedded with software or to supply software on payment of license fees to the indian company and issuing Letter of authority to the chip vendor to load the software. Under these facts, whether Indian company can take shelter under the recent SC ruling in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence P Ltd for non deduction of TDS on software payment to Singapore co. |
Long term Capital Gains from sale of flat – whether brought forward long term capital loss to be setoff before deduction u/s.54EC | |
---|---|
Excerpt of query: | An assessee has earned long term capital gain on sale of his share of flat after determining the indexed cost. He wishes to obtain exemption for the gain by investing in bonds u/s.54EC. He also has brought forward long term capital loss which he would to set off against future gains on sale of shares. Whether the long term capital gain on sale of flat has to be determined by first deducting the brought forward loss and he can avail the benefit of Section 54EC only in respect of the balance income? |
Income tax on Dividends received by Non-Residents | |
---|---|
Excerpt of query: | From Assessment Year 2021-22, dividends are liable to income tax in the hands of the recipient. In case of residents the dividend received is taxed at the applicable tax slab rate. But it seems that in case of Non-Residents, the dividends received are to be taxed at the flat rate of 20% u/s.115A. The correct position may please be confirmed. |
CREDIT OF ADVANCE TAX PAID IN INCOME DECLARATION SCHEME-2016-Issue of reassessment notice u/s 148 | |
---|---|
Excerpt of query: | CREDIT FOR ADVANCE TAX WAS TAKEN FOR THE INCOME DECLARED UNDER THE INCOME DECLARATION SCHEME FORM WAS SUBMITTED ONLINE- CPC CREDIT WAS ALLOWED TO FORMS FILED PHYSICALLY BUT CPC HAS NOT TAKEN ANY ACTION NOW 148 NOTICE IS ISSUED BY ITO WHAT COULD BE REMEDY |
Whether decisions u/s 271(1)(c) will be applicable for penalty u/s 270A. | |
---|---|
Excerpt of query: | As per Bombay H.C. (Goa Bench)(Full Bench) in Mr. Mohd. Farhan A. Shaikh in T.A. M 51 & 57 of 2012 and many other decisions of ITAT, No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is leviable if – In Notice u/s 271(1)(c) – Irrelevant part not strike off. In penalty notice u/s 270 A – under reporting of Income or misreporting of income not strike off. But in the body of assessment order initiation of penalty is for under- reporting of income. Query- Whether the aforesaid decision of Hon’able Bombay HC will be equally applicable in penalty u/s 270A ? |