My client’s case is a Non Search Case and he has filled in the Tax payable. But the Form is insisting on “Tax Payable for Search Case” also and not accepting Zero – it is showing the Error “enter Valid amount”

My assessees return was processed for the ay 2015-16 and refund of Rs 172284/- was received including interest of Rs5166/-.Subsequently the case was selected for scrutiny and a demand was made of Rs 272450/-including interest u/s 234a 9656/-,234b 18744/- ,244a 5166/-,234d 9760/-.The assessee opted for vivad se viswas scheme and filed the same .However on receipt of Form 3 it is seen the only 234a and 234b has been waived and interest under 244a and 234d have been demanded with disputed tax .May i know whats the correct treatment .Is the interest waived is only with respect to disputed tax ??Kindly help

In my case after issue of Form 3 on 14/12/20 a communication has been received giving a revised Form 3 increasing the Tax payable quoting a Circular by CDBT dated 4/12/20. My case while it was of Assesment under Sec 143 as also informed in Form 1 submitted by me is now being treated as a Search case due to some guidelines in the captioned circular. Sec 5(3) of the VsV scheme clearly stipulates the the Form e once issued is conclusive and can not be reopened in any subsequent proceeding under the OT Act.

Assessment order u/s 147 read with sec. 144 passed and later on Ex-parte order u/s 271(1)(C) also passed by the same AO in the same case. The appeals against both the orders are pending with CIT (A). What will be the liability under VSVS? only Tax amount or Tax + 25% of penalty..?

In a case, an assessment was made denying the exemption under section 54 claimed by the assessee on the ground that the new residential property constructed was used for commercial purposes though initial approval was given by the Corporation for residential unit. While completing the assessment the A.O. did not allow any deduction for cost of acquisition (CoA) on the ground that it was not claimed in the return though in the course of the hearing request was made in writing to allow the CoA. Both appeal and rectification application was filed. The A.O. after nearly 10 months rejected the rectification application. Can VSV application be filed with the request to allow payment of tax only on the amount payable after CoA which is allowable under the law? Can the Designated Authority direct the A.O. to compute the tax after deduction of CoA?

The assessment is done u/s 143(3) and addition is made for LTCG for penny stock case. No search / search assessment was done on the assessee. We have filed for VSV. The AO is planning to amend calculations of Tax considering this as a search case based on Q no. 70 in FAQs. He is of the view that search was done on a kolkata based entity and from that the informations has been passed by the investigation wing. Hence according to him the Reply to the FAQ applies in our case. Kindly guide.

Sir,
Under DTVSV scheme i have submitted form 4 online. But have not received any acknowledgement for the same. Its shows form was submitted. How do we check if it has been received by the authorities. And after submission of form 4 what is the time period to receive form 5 from the authorities

AO passed the order U/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 by making addition. Later Assessee filed the appeal with CIT (A) who unfavours the assessee by confirming the addition made by AO. Assessee later filed the appeal with ITAT which given the decision on 19/12/2019 as “The Assessing Officer shall grant reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee in accordance with set principles of natural justice. Thus, all the grounds raised by the assessee in this appeal are allowed for statistical purposes.” Till date no notice is being issued by AO for hearing. Now assessee wants to opt for VsV can he apply for the same. Also how he can show the appeal pending in the Form No.1.

A CASE OF 194-I RELATING TO DEDUCTION OF TDS FOR AY-2010-11.
ASSESSEE HAVE NOT DEDUCTED TDS ON RENT, AN DEMAND WAS RAISED AGAINST IT, FOR WHICH I WAS OPTING VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME,WHILE LOGIN TO WEBSITE,ON TAB OF SCHEME SELECTING ASSESMENT YEAR TAB IT SHOWING FROM AY 13-14.
AND THE ASSESSEE HAVING A CASE OF AY-2010-11.

THEN HOW ASSESSEE CAN OPT FOR SUCH SCHEME.

Hello Sir

Assessee’s appeal for AY 2009-2010 in ITAT was partly allowed, bogus purchase addition is reduce from 12.5% to 5%
Assessee did not file appeal against the ITAT order.
Department has filed appeal in High court against the order of ITAT.
Assessee has two more appeal pending before CIT (A) on similar grounds and fact.
Now will assessee get benefit of 50% on having favorable judgment from higher authority in VsV for this two pending appeal before CIT (A) which are on same ground and facts?