Thank You

Thank You For Your Question. We Will Send It To Our Experts For A Reply. Please check the main page for a reply.

The answers given below are in response to queries asked by other people.
Name CA Lalit Munoyat
Query

While filling form no 1 , it asks for the section under which the order was passed. The order was passed by the AO under section 143(3) and the last appellate order was passed by the ITAT u/s 254. The department is in appeal in the high court. Which section to select : 143(3) or 254.
Thanks

Answer Click here
Name Bimal doshi
Query

How to provide details of the payment made through set off the disputed penalty amount against refund of the subsequent assessment years in Part C

Answer Click here
Name Rishabh Jain
Query

HI, CAN WE REVISE FORM 3 AS PER NEW RULES. WE HAVE FILED THE FORM CORRECTLY WHICH WAS OKAYED AND PROCESS REACHED FORM-3. NOW IT0 IS RAISING A NEW DEMAND WEF 31.03.2020 . THIS DEMAND WAS NIETHER COMMUNICATED TO US AND IS ALSO NOT AVAILABLE ONLINE. ITO IS CREATING PRESSURE TO REVISE IT. WHETHER WE ARE BOUND TOREVISE IT. WHAT IF WE DONT DO THE SAME. CAN HE HARASS US BY OTHER WAYS.

Answer Click here
Name Suresh Goyal
Query

A Private Limited Company filed return within time for A.Y. 2012-13 declaring NIL income. The assessee is a civil contractor. The company did not deduct TDS on payment made to sub-contractor, rent on machinery, interest on loan and salary to director. The books could not be produced as there was fire. The AO disallowed the total payments made to sub-contractor, rent on machinery, interest on loan and salary to directors.
The AO also disallowed 10% of the amount of total receipt by the company less the above four payments i.e. payment to sub-contractor, rent on machinery, , interest on loan and salary to directors. The CIT (Appeal) dismissed the appeal of the assessee and confirmed the addition made by the AO. It is an auditable case u/s 44AB. W.E.F. 01.04.2015, u/s 40(a)(ia) only 30% of the amount is disallowable in the TDS has not been deducted or after deduction not deposited. Please let us know whether the benefit of 30% disallowable u/s 40(a)(ia) can be taken in A.Y. 2012-13 i.e. retrospectively. Whether the assessment can be made at the rate of 8% on total turnover or should the assessee go for VSVS. The amount disallowed is approximately Rs. 2.00 Crs. Rs. 1.45 Crs due to TDS and Rs. 55.00 Lacs 10% of total turnover minus amount on which TDS not deducted. Please advise whether the assessee should go for VSVS or should fight appeal in ITAT.

Answer Click here
Name Rajesh T
Query

We had returned a net loss of Rs. 12,00,000/- for the AY 2016-17. During the course of assessment u/s. 143(3), there was an addition to the tune of Rs. 30,00,000/-. So, the net income was assessed at Rs. 18,00,000/-. The appeal is pending as on 31.01.2020.

Out of the returned loss of Rs. 12,00,000/-, we have already set off a loss of Rs. 5,00,000/- in the AY 2017-18 and the balance loss of Rs. 7,00,000/- is still available as on date. We do not foresee any profits in the subsequent years to set off the balance loss of Rs. 7,00,000/- and it is bound to lapse.

In this scenario, what is the disputed income for which we have to file the application under DTVSV Act for the AY 2016-17?

Answer Click here
Name Ca Vishal Sehgal
Query

Assessee case was reopened u/s 148 on some grounds for AY 2010-11 AR attended the hearings but before AOcould conclude and pass an order reoopeing was challenged with writ in high court. Till date no orders has been passed by High court. Can Assesse settle the same in Vsvs scheme on the basis of reasons recorded and mentioned for reopening of the case u/S 147/148

Answer Click here
Name C.Chuttani
Query

declaration form of vivad se vishwas is rejected by CIT without given any reason

what remedies is available with assessee

declaration in respect of disputed TDS interest and penalty

further while filing form again schedule B of the form 1 is not active

Answer Click here
Name Milind Wadhwani
Query

The demand on 31.jan.20 was deleted by cit (a) in the month of August 20. Can the appellant buy peace by paying 50% of the disputed demand,

Answer Click here
Name Nitin Joshi
Query

The following field appears in Form 1 in part F. (This is visible in print out taken in PDF version of Form No.1 already filed. But this field is not visible in online Form l

Part F
v) The following refunds have been determined but are
unpaid- these may be considered for adjustment against the
Net tax payable in Part F
S. No. Assessment Year Order Reference number / DIN if
any
Amount of Refund determined

Query 1. How to fill information under this F (v) field
2. Whether refunds due for different assessment years can be adjusted against tax payable under VSVS

Answer Click here
Name heenal
Query

1. What are the documents need to be attached for vivad se vishwas scheme after filing form1 and 2

2. amount is payable after availing benefit of vivad se vishwas so can i make the payment through challan

3. The form 35 for the year 2008-09 have been filed manually so we do not have the acknowledgement no. in that case is it mandatory to fill in acknwldgmnt no.

Answer Click here