Upload Judgements: If you have a judgement on an important topic that you would like to share with others, please
use this form to upload it
Publish Articles: If you have written an article on a legal topic which you would like to share,
use this form to publish it. Articles on all legal topics are welcome. However, they must be original (not plagiarized) and not published elsewhere
Latest judgements uploaded (
See all)
Mumbai Tribunal : S. 56 : Income from other sources – Property received for inadequate consideration – Difference between agreement value and stamp duty value – Oral agreement supported by contemporaneous evidence –Agreement fixing the consideration and does not mandatorily require a written agreement - Change in stamp duty valuation method – Addition not sustainable- No binding precedent…
Read More ...
Bombay High Court: S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes – Carry forward of deficit – Excess expenditure incurred by trust in earlier years – Set off against income of subsequent years – Permissible – Appeal of Revenue dismissed. [S. 11(1)(a), 11(1)(d), 260A.] The Revenue challenged the Tribunal’s order allowing the assessee–trust to carry forward the deficit…
Read More ...
Bombay High Court: S. 270A : Penalty for under -reporting and misreporting of income - Transfer Pricing adjustment – Advanced Pricing Agreement – No order passed u/s. 92CD(3) on modified return – Virtual hearing mandatory under Faceless Penalty Scheme – Penalty order quashed and matter remanded to AO to grant virtual hearing and pass fresh speaking order within…
Read More ...
Latest articles published (
See all)
By
Ms. Neelam C. Jadhav Advocate: CORRESPONDING ANALYSIS OF PENALTY PROVISIONS UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT, 2025
Read More ...
By
CA Anilkumar Shah: It is decided under 1. The Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employments Act, 1975, clearly that the trusts which do not carry out any business or trade etc. are not liable to pay the profession tax (PTEC) and cannot be forced, as the PT Act itself is not applicable to them. There…
Read More ...
By
CA Milind Wadhwani: Recently, there has been considerable discussion within tax professional circles about significant changes observed while filing Form No. 35—the prescribed form for appeals before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]. In the author’s view, the additional details currently being sought through the e-Filing portal cannot be legally mandated unless and until a revised Form No.…
Read More ...