Van Oord ACZ India (P) Ltd v. CIT ( 2023) 453 ITR 214 / 292 Taxman 405/ 226 DTR 89 / 332 CTR 310(SC) Editorial : Van Oord ACZ India (P) Ltd v. CIT ( 2010) 323 ITR 130/ 189 Taxman 232 ( Delhi)( HC) , para 4 is set aside .

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source -Non-resident – Reimbursement of mobilisation and demobilisation costs to a foreign company – Subsequently the foreign company was held liable to tax in India – Not liable to deduct tax at source – Cannot be treated as assessee -in -default – DTAA -India – Netherlands .[ S. 9(1)(vi), 195, Art. 12, Art. 136 ]

The assessee is a wholly owned subsidiary of VOAMC , reimbursement of mobilisation and demobilisation costs to a foreign company . The Assessing Officer the disallowed the amount by applying the provision of section 40(a)(i) of the Act on the ground that the asssesee had defaulted in deducting tax at source under section 195 of the Act  while making payment to VOAMC . High Court held that  the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source in respect of amount reimbursed  , however  , if assessment proceedings in case of foreign were reopened and final view taken was that it was assessable to tax , then the assessee would also be treated as assessee -in default , attracting consequences provided under section 40(a)(i) of the Act. On appeal the Court held that once the assessee was held to be not liable to deduct tax at source , merely because subsequently , foreign company VOAMC  was held liable , the assessee could not be treated as assessee in default . order of the High Court was quashed and set aside . (AY. 2003 -04 )