Judgements Uploaded By Users In Category: Income-Tax Act
These judgements are uploaded by our esteemed readers. If you have a judgement on an important topic that you would like to share with others, please use this form to upload it
The Delhi ITAT has held that Case of alleged bogus purchase: All details in the form of books of accounts, copy invoices, GR, bilties etc. were filed before the Assessing Officer and the AO without pointing out any specific defect therein rejected the books of account u/s 145(3) and made the impugned addition of Rs. Rs.12,86,416/- by applying the GP rate… Read More ...
The Delhi ITAT has held that Hon'ble ITAT held that Notice issued u/s 143(2) by the Assessing Officer on 24.09.2018 having been issued in violation of the binding CBDT Instruction No.F.No.225/157/2017/ITA-II dated 23.06.2017. The CBDT u/s 119 of the Act issued the above instructions prescribing mandatory revised formats for all scrutiny notices issued u/s 143(2) of the Act. These instructions are… Read More ...
The Bombay High Court has held that S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-PF/ESI contribution-Subsequent decision of Supreme Court-Cannot be ground for rectification-Tribunal erred in recalling its order on the basis of subsequent ruling-Writ petition allowed. [S. 254(1), 143(1)(a), 36(1)(va), 43B, 260A, Art. 226, CPC O. 47 R.1] The assessee filed return for AY 2019–20. CPC disallowed employees’… Read More ...
The ITAT Mumbai has held that S. 73 : Loss in share trading-Speculation loss-Set-off-Not allowable against profit from F&O transactions-Arbitrage operations- Explanation to S.73 operates independently of S.43(5)-Speculative loss cannot be adjusted against F&O business income. [S. 28(i), 43(5)] The assessee, a stock broker, engaged in arbitrage operations, simultaneously purchased shares in the cash segment and sold them in the F&O… Read More ...
The Bombay High Court has held that S. 143(3) : Assessment- Appeal pending before CIT(A)-Writ- Alternate remedy-Writ petition not maintainable- Extraordinary jurisdiction-Not to be invoked when alternate statutory remedy is available- The Court directed CIT(A) to dispose of the appeals (both against assessment and penalty orders) within eight weeks. [S. 144B, 250, Art. 226] The assessee challenged the assessment order passed, demand… Read More ...
The Mumbai Tribunal has held that S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Notice issued under section 148 with sanction of PCIT instead of JCIT-Survey- Invalid sanction-Assessment held to be null and void. [S. 133A, 143(3), 151(2), 147 , 148] The assessee, engaged in stock broking and financial services, had filed its return which was assessed under section 143(3). Subsequently, on… Read More ...
The Mumbai Tribunal has held that S. 56 : Income from other sources-Immovable property- Purchase consideration-DVO valuation-Difference of 7% within 10% safe harbor-Amendment by Finance Act, 2020 curative and retrospective- Addition deleted. [S. 50C, 56(2)(x)(b)(B)] The assessee, an individual, purchased a property for ₹60,00,000/-. The District Valuation Officer (DVO) valued the property at ₹64,84,000/-, resulting in a difference of ₹4,84,000/-. The… Read More ...
The HONBLE ITAT,AGRA SMC BENCH ,AGRA has held that FOR A MERE TECHNICAL VENIAL BREACH COMMITTED BY THE ASSESSSEE IN FURNISHING THE REQUISITE DETAILS AT THE TIME OF OF ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS ,WHICH WERE ULTIMATELY FURNISED SUBSEQUENTLY BEFORE THE COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT U/S 143(3), NO PENALTY U/S 272A(1)(d) CAN BE LEVIED . Read More ...
The Mumbai Tribunal has held that S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Abated assessment-No incriminating material was found-Alleged bogus purchases-Addition was deleted. [S. 69C, 132] Dismissing the appeal of the revenue the Tribunal held that without any incriminating material found during search proceedings the addition cannot be made in respect of abated assessment. Followed, PCIT v. Abhisar Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (2023)454 ITR 212 /… Read More ...
The Chennai Tribunal has held that S. 64 : Clubbing of income-Minor child-Capital gains-Sale of inherited property-Minor daughter’s share deposited in nationalized bank under Court order-Not includible in assessee’s hands. [S. 45, 54F, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, S.8(2)] The assessee sold property inherited from his deceased wife, being entitled along with his minor daughter to equal shares. The City… Read More ...