Judgements Uploaded By Users In Category: Income-Tax Act
These judgements are uploaded by our esteemed readers. If you have a judgement on an important topic that you would like to share with others, please use this form to upload it
The Mumbai Tribunal has held that S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Notice issued after three years from the end of the relevant assessment year-Principal Chief Commissioner-Approval obtained from Principal Commissioner instead of Principal Chief Commissioner-Reassessment notice and consequential order is quashed and set aside. [S. 56(2)(vii)(b), 144B, 147, 148, 151(ii)] The Assessing Officer framed the assessment under Section 147… Read More ...
The Bombay High Court has held that S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Non existing company-Merger of companies-Notice served on non-existing company or entity despite the respondents’ knowledge of its non-existence-Notice is quashed and set aside. [S. 2(31), 292B, 148A, 151, 292B, Art. 226] The petitioner company, City Corporation Limited (CCL), merged with its subsidiary company, Amanora Future Towers Pvt. Ltd. (AFTPL) in 2018, as… Read More ...
The Bombay High Court has held that S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Book profit-Decapitalization of interest-Failure of Assessing Officer to examine computation of book profits-Order of Tribunal affirming the revision order of Commissioner is affirmed. [S. 32AB, 115J, 260A] The Assessing Officer accepted the assessee’s computation of book profits under Section 115J off the Act. The CIT invoked Section… Read More ...
The Bombay High Court has held that S. 271(1) : Penalty-Concealment-Revaluing the asset, introducing it into the partnership, and withdrawing substantial funds, amounted to a device to evade tax rather than a genuine business transaction- The Explanation offered by the Appellant was found to be patently false -Levy of concealment penalty is affirmed. [S. 260A] The appellant firm revalued the stock in… Read More ...
The Bombay High Court has held that S. 147 : Reassessment-Objection disposed along with the assessment order-Order passed without disposing the objection by passing a separate order- Failure to dispose of objections separate order-Reopening notice and reassessment order is quashed and set aside. [S. 80 IA, 142 (1), 143(3), 148, Art. 226] The assessment of the petitioner was completed under Section 143(3)… Read More ...
The Bombay High Court has held that S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes- Circular-Return of income -Condonation of delay-Jurisdictional error-Power vested in CBDT- Order passed by Dy. CIT (OSD) (OT & WT) is without jurisdiction- Quashed and remanded to CBDT. [S. 119(2)(b) , 139, Art. 226] The petitioner filed an application under Section 119(2)(b) for condonation of a 10-month delay… Read More ...
The Bombay High Court has held that S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Show cause notice less than 7 days-Personal hearing through video conference is not granted-All replies are considered-Alternative remedy-Writ petition is dismissed. [S. 143(3), Art. 226] The petitioner challenged the order passed under section 143(3) read with section 144B of the Act on the ground of principle of natural justice. Revenue contended… Read More ...
The Mumbai Tribunal has held that S. 68 : Cash credits-Purchase and sales through book entries with sub -broker-Commodity exchange-Futures Speculative transactions- Forward market commission-Accommodate bogus loss-Transaction with sub –broker-Addition is deleted. On the basis of information from investigation wing the Assessment of the appellant was reopened. The Assessing Officer added entire purchase and sales transactions with sub broker as cash… Read More ...
The NAGPUR BENCH has held that S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Belated filing of return- Denial of exemption is not justified- Addition made under Section 143(1)(a)(ii) of the Act is deleted-Directed to accept the returned income-Circular of CBDT is binding on Revenue. [S. 12, 12A(1)(b), 119, 139(1), 139(4), 143(1)(a)(ii)] Allowing the appeal of the assessee the Tribunal held that… Read More ...
The Bombay High Court has held that S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes- Circular-Condonation of delay of 1585 days-Revised return-Principle of natural justice-No personal hearing was granted-In the absence of any provision to the contrary, such principles should be read into the unoccupied interstices of a statute-Order of rejection is set aside and directed to pass the order after granting… Read More ...