Judgements Uploaded By Users In Category: Income-Tax Act
These judgements are uploaded by our esteemed readers. If you have a judgement on an important topic that you would like to share with others, please use this form to upload it
The Delhi Tribunal has held that S. 115BAA : Tax on income of certain domestic companies – Determination of tax in certain cases- Option exercised under section 115BAA – Rate of tax applicable – Long term capital gains – Company opting for taxation under section 115BAA is liable to pay tax at 22% on total income including long-term capital gains and… Read More ...
The Mumbai Tribunal has held that S. 263 : Commissioner - Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue -Limited Scrutiny – Deemed rental income -Order passed after due enquiry cannot be treated as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue – PCIT cannot revise assessment to include issues beyond the scope of limited scrutiny (S.143(3), IND AS-115) The assessee, an individual… Read More ...
The Chennai Tribunal has held that S. 275 : Penalty-Bar of limitation- Recording of satisfaction-Cross objection- CBDT Circular binding on department -Period of limitation is to be reckoned from the date of recording of satisfaction by the AO in the assessment order and not from the date of notice issued by the Joint/Additional CIT. [S. 119, 269SS, 271D, 271E, 271AAA, 275(1)(c)]… Read More ...
The Delhi High Court has held that S. 278B : Offences by companies-Prosecution of directors without impleading company-Not maintainable-Arraignment of company is a condition precedent for prosecuting its directors-Company being the principal offender must first be made an accused-Proceedings against directors alone quashed. [S. 276, 281, Cr PC, 1973, S. 482 BNSS, Act, 2023, S. 528, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, S. 141]… Read More ...
The Mumbai Tribunal has held that S. 92C : Transfer Pricing–Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Characterisation of Indian Entity-Limited Risk Distributor-Entrepreneurial Service Provider- Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM)-Other Method under Rule 10AB-Re-characterisation of Transactions-Royalty Computation-Transfer Pricing Adjustment of ₹444.93 Cr held to be unsustainable. [R. 10AB] The assessee, Netflix Entertainment Services India LLP, engaged in distribution of access to the global… Read More ...
The Mumbai Tribunal has held that S. 9(1)(vii) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services (FTS)-Functional Service Agreement- Standardized support services – No managerial, technical or consultancy element – Not taxable as FTS- DTAA- India–Belgium. [S.9(1)(vi)), Art. 12(3)(a), 12(3)(b)] The assessee, Solvay S.A. (Belgium), received Rs.109.72 crore from its Indian affiliates, Solvay Specialties India Pvt. Ltd.… Read More ...
The Mumbai Tribunal has held that S. 263 : Commissioner - Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue - Special category States - Manufacture of essential oils and perfumery -Assessment without incriminating material – Search assessment – Deduction u/s 80IC – Revisionary power cannot be exercised in respect of completed/unabated assessments in absence of incriminating material – Revision order quashed. [S. 80IC,… Read More ...
The KARNATAKA HIGH COURT has held that S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal –Duties - Alleged AI-generated order – Bias apprehension – Transfer of case – Once the ITAT President reassigned the matter to another Bench, writ petition seeking deferment of hearing became infructuous. [Art. 226, 227] The assessee filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court seeking a direction to defer… Read More ...
The Bombay High Court has held that S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions - Wilful attempt to evade tax- Failure to pay self-assessment tax along with return-Mere delay in payment of self-assessment tax does not amount to wilful attempt to evade tax-Continuation of prosecution would be abuse of process of law-Complaint quashed and dismissed. [S. 139, 140A,143(1), 276C(1), 276(2) ,276B, 278E, 279(1),Art.… Read More ...
The Bombay High Court has held that S. 143(3) : Assessment-Principles of natural justice-Assessment order passed without considering reply to notice u/s 133(6) and by relying on non-existent case law-Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Quasi-judicial authorities cannot rely blindly on results generated by AI tools without independent verification- Breach of natural justice- Alternative remedy-Appeal was filed to avoid limitation-Assessment quashed and matter remanded [S. 68,… Read More ...