Judgements Uploaded By Users In Category: Income-Tax Act
These judgements are uploaded by our esteemed readers. If you have a judgement on an important topic that you would like to share with others, please use this form to upload it

Tata Capital Financial Services Limited v. ACIT (Bombay High Court)

The Bombay High Court has held that S. 147 : Reassessment-Revenue directed to guidelines for reassessment- CBDT to issue guidelines to its officerrs based on the Order with clear instructions which are to be strictly followed. [S. 148, 149, 150, 151, Art. 226] The Hon’ble Bombay High Court, inter alia directed the revenue to adhere to certain guidelines to be followed for… Read More ...

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS MAHLA REAL ESTATE (P) LTD (Rajasthan High Court)

The RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT JAIPUR has held that The High Court confirmed the quashing of the reassessment order by the Tribunal in absence of a valid service of notice u/s 148 prior to making of the assessment, holding that the Tribunal came to the factual finding that before passing the order of the assessment, notice of reopening was never served on the assessee… Read More ...

Apex Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Supreme Court)

The Supreme Court has held that S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Explanation 1-Freebies given to doctors-Prohibited by law-Disallowed as expense-Interpretation-Taxing statutes to be interpreted strictly. [Medical Council Act, 1956, S. 20A , Medical Council (professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, R. 6.8, Contract Act, 1872, S. 23, General Clauses Act, 1897, S.2(38), Indian Penal Code, 1860, S. 40, 43] Honourable Supreme… Read More ...

JM Financial Foundation v. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)

The Mumbai Tribunal has held that S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue- CSR funds received-Specific projects-Not income of the trust- sustainable view taken by the Ld. AO-Order of revision set aside. [S. 2(24), 11] Where the Ld. Assessing Officer (AO), inter alia, had relied on the decision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of DIT… Read More ...

KLJ ORGANIC LTD vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) – 2 (Delhi High Court)

The HIGH COURT OF DELHI has held that The Hon'ble Delhi High Court has recently decided a case where the Hon'ble Court was pleased to apply section 14 of the Limitation Act in the Income Tax Proceedings to exclude the time the assessee had spent in pursuing its remedies before a forum without jurisdiction for the calculation of limitation period. The relevant part… Read More ...

RAJIV AGARWAL vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE 20, NEW DELHI & ANR (Delhi High Court)

The HIGH COURT OF DELHI has held that THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT HAS BEEN PLEASED TO ISSUE NOTICE ON THE WRIT PETITION RAISING THE QUESTION OF LAW THAT "WHETHER THE AMENDMENT BROUGHT ABOUT BY THE FINANCE ACT 2017 UNDER SECTION 153C OF THE ACT IS PROSPECTIVE FROM THE DATE OF SEARCH" [W.P.(C) 3221/2022, 3224/2022, 3152/2022,3153/2022, 3155/2022] Read More ...

Horticulture Experiment Station Gonikopal, Coorg Vs Regional Provident Fund Organisation (Supreme Court)

The Supreme Court of India has held that Horticulture Experiment Station Gonikopal, Coorg Vs Regional Provident Fund Organisation Forum-Supreme Court of India Date-23rd February 2022 Sub-Whether element of Mens rea (guilty mind) is essential for violation of civil laws. The Supreme Court in this case was called upon to decide that once an employer violated the law relating to deposit of PF, whether… Read More ...

E-Land Apparel Ltd. v. ACIT (Bombay High Court)

The Bombay High Court has held that S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Interest and property tax paid subsequently after slump sale-Claimed as deduction in the year of payment-Amount disclosed in tax audit report relying on case law-Reassessment notice for incorrect claim- Change of opinion-Reassessment notice was quashed. [S. 43B, 44AB, 148 , Art. 226] In the Form No 3CD… Read More ...

Rakesh Garg Vs PCIT Ajmer (Rajasthan High court)

The Rajasthan high court has held that Rakesh Garg Vs PCIT Ajmer Forum-Rajasthan High Court Date-17th February 2022 Sub-Whether Appeal filed before ITAT after the cut-off date of 31/1/2020 and delay in filing the appeal having been condoned, the application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act 2020 is eligible to be accepted or is to be rejected in terms of FAQ No… Read More ...

DCIT v. Dilip J. Thakkar (ITAT Mumbai)

The Mumbai Tribunal has held that S. 149 : Reassessment-Foreign asset-HSBC Geneva account of Trust -Time limit for notice-16 years-Assets held outside India- Introduced vide Finance Act, 2012-Retrospective in nature. [S. 147, 148, 151] A search and seizure operation were carried out in the assessee’s premises on August 10, 2011. Documents were found pertaining to a foreign bank account, based on… Read More ...