Judgements Uploaded By Users In Category: Income-Tax Act
These judgements are uploaded by our esteemed readers. If you have a judgement on an important topic that you would like to share with others, please use this form to upload it
The Madras High Court has held that Synopsis: The Madras High Court noted that as per Section 5(1) of the Income Tax Act, the assessee comes under the category of NOR assessee and is liable to pay tax only on income earned in India. Specifically, Section 5(1) excludes “income which accrues or arises outside India“ in the case of Not Ordinarily Resident… Read More ...
The ITAT, JAIPUR BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM has held that 1. In the case appeal filed before THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, where the appellate opt to VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME. The ITAT only adjudicate the issue of condonation of delay. Held yes. 2. In a government company the delay can be condone 427 days on the ground of transfer/retirement of concerned person who have… Read More ...
The IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES “A”, JAIPUR has held that 1.Whether the order passed u/s 12AA(3) and 4 by PCIT (central) for cancellation of Registration of trust is illegal invalid due to without jurisdiction where the jurisdiction of assent purpose transfer to central circle u/s 127 from the exemption, held yes (in favour of assessee). 2.Whether the order for cancellation of registration of a trust… Read More ...
The ITAT Mumbai has held that The ITAT Mumbai had to consider two questions of law: 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Commissioner of Income-tax (A) has erred in upholding the action of the learned Assessing Officer to tax Employee Stock Option as perquisite u/s 17. 2. Without prejudice to above, on… Read More ...
The The High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital has held that On the Writ Petition of The Dehradun Chartered Accountants Society for extension of the due date for filing ITR & TAR, the hon'ble High Court of Uttarakhand permitted the petitioner to submit fresh representation before the CBDT & directed the CBDT to leniently consider the said representation after giving the petitioner the opportunity of being… Read More ...
The Supreme Court of India has held that *THE MAVILAYI SERVICE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. & ORS. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CALICUT & ANR.* *Date-12th January 2021* *Forum-Supreme Court of India* *Sub-Whether Cooperative society granting loans to nominal members as per the statute is eligible to get deduction u/s 80P of the Income-tax Act,1961.* The three judges bench of Apex Court in the… Read More ...
The Pune ITAT has held that Pune ITAT held that Commissioner of Income Tax is not empowered invoke the revisionary jurisdiction u/s.263 of the Income Tax Act to look into the other issues relating to the assessee which were not within the purview of the limited scrutiny. The CBDT Circular vide its letter F-No.225/26/2006-ITA-II (Pt.), 8th September, 2010 has described the… Read More ...
The Pune ITAT has held that The assessee was initially following the Percentage completion method by showing income on the basis of percentage of work done. In contrast, the project completion method, which is an equally recognized method, mandates the determination of income at the time of completion of project. Both the methods are recognized methods. Whereas, in the first method,… Read More ...