Judgements Uploaded By Users In Category: Other Laws
These judgements are uploaded by our esteemed readers. If you have a judgement on an important topic that you would like to share with others, please use this form to upload it

C Bright Vs The District Collector & Ors

The Supreme Court of India has held that C Bright Vs The District Collector & Ors Supreme Court of India Date:05-11-2020 Act -Section 14 of SARFESI Act,2000 The Apex court in the above case was dealing with a question of law as to whether the time limit of 30 days which is further extendable by a further period 30 days for a District… Read More ...

Kiran Gupta Vs State Bank of India

The Delhi High court has held that Kiran Gupta Vs State Bank of India & Another. WP(C) 7230/2020 decided on 4th November,2020 Whether bank can institute or continued with proceedings against a guarantor under SARFESI Act when proceedings are the principal borrowers are pending under the Insolvency Code. The above question of law was argued by the State Bank by relying on… Read More ...

Rajnesh Vs Neha & Another

The Supreme Court of India has held that The Apex Court today on 4th November, 2020 in the case of Rajnesh Vs Neha & Another in a land mark decision regarding maintenance etc u/s 125 of CrPC issued guidelines regarding the following:- General Guidelines and Directions Issue of Overlapping Jurisdictions Payment of interim maintenance Criteria for determining quantum of maintenance Date from which… Read More ...

Imperia Structures Limited Vs Anil Patni & Another

The Supreme Court has held that The Apex court on 2nd November,2020 dismissed the appeal of Imperia structures limited Vs Anil Patni & Another against order passed by the National Consumer Dispute Resolution Council when the jurisdiction of NCDRC to entertain the complain in view of the registration under the Real Estate Regulation Act (RERA) was subject matter of challenge. The… Read More ...

Thought Blurb Vs Union of India & Ors

The Bombay High court has held that Declaration under Sabka Sath Sabka Vishwas Legacy scheme rejected- Bombay High court sets aside the rejection order allowing the Writ. The Bombay High court in the case of Thought Blurb Vs Union of India & Ors in WP No 871 of 2020 on 27th October, 2020 was dealing with a writ where the petitioner challenged… Read More ...

The Supreme Industries Limited Vs The CBIC & Another

The Bombay High court has held that Whether cart can be put after the horse- how without dealing with the facts, the operative part of the order can be recorded? Bombay High court comes down heavily on Customs officer and sets aside the order in a landmark decision pronounced on 27/10/2020 The Bombay High court in the case of The Supreme Industries… Read More ...

L &T Housing Finance Ltd Vs Trishul Developers & Another

The Supreme Court has held that Issue of notice under SARFESI Act by L & T Housing Finance Limited wrongly on the letter head of L & T Finance Ltd- Challenge by the borrower as illegal- Supreme Court holds the challenge to be baseless. The Apex Court on 27th October, 2020 in the case of L & T Housing Finance Ltd… Read More ...

Sandip Kumar Bajaj & Another Vs State Bank of India & Another

The Calcutta High court has held that Whether proceedings for declaration of wilful defaulter can continue pending moratorium under the IBC Law-Calcutta high court land mark ruling The Calcutta high court in the case of Sandip Kumar Bajaj & Ors Vs SBI in WP No 236 of 2020 on 15/9/2020 was considering challenge to a SCN issued by State Bank of India… Read More ...

Satish Chander Ahuja Vs Sneha Ahuja (Supreme Court)

The Supreme Court has held that Father in law Vs Daughter in law-Supreme court pronounces landmark decision The Apex Courtin the case of Satish Chander Ahuja Vs Sneha Ahuja in Civil Appeal No 2483 of 2020 dismissed the appeal of father in law where interalia it was argued that the house property where daughter in law was staying since marriage was… Read More ...

B. SANTOSHAMMA & ANR. Versus D. SARALA & ANR.

The THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA has held that It is well settled that the onus of proof lies on the party who makes an allegation. It is well settled that time is not of essence to agreements for sale of immovable property, unless the agreement specifically and expressly incorporates the consequence of cancellation of the agreement, upon failure to comply with a term… Read More ...