Judgements Uploaded By Users In Category: Other Laws
These judgements are uploaded by our esteemed readers. If you have a judgement on an important topic that you would like to share with others, please use this form to upload it
The Supreme Court has held that Condonation of delay On a harmonious consideration of the provisions of the limitation law and the law laid down by the Supreme Court, it is evident that: (i) Law of limitation is based upon public policy that there should be an end to litigation by forfeiting the right to remedy rather than the right itself;… Read More ...
The Supreme Court has held that (i) Once there was a registered partnership deed, there is no further document placed on record by the complainant-respondent No.1 regarding dissolution of the said registered deed which continued till the time when the investment was made by the complainant respondent No.1 on 21.05.2002 and hence the complainant respondent No.1 would be deemed to be… Read More ...
The Supreme Court has held that (i) It hardly matters whether a litigant is a private party or a State or Union of India when it comes to condoning the gross delay of more than 12 years. If the litigant chooses to approach the court long after the lapse of the time prescribed under the relevant provisions of the law, then… Read More ...
The Supreme Court has held that S. 14(2) of the Limitation Act: Time spent bonafidely and diligently and in good faith before the wrong forum is bound to be excluded when computing limitation before the Court having competent jurisdiction Section 14(2) of the Limitation Act carves out an exception excluding the period of limitation when the proceedings are being pursued with… Read More ...
The Supreme Court has held that Tests to be satisfied before grant of interim injunctions/ stay orders (i) The three-fold test of establishing (i) a prima facie case, (ii) balance of convenience and (iii) irreparable loss or harm, for the grant of interim relief, is well-established in the jurisprudence of this Court. This test is equally applicable to the grant of… Read More ...
The Bombay High Court has held that (1) The power exercised by the proper officer under Section 110(5) of the Customs Act, 1962 in directing provisional attachment of the bank account of a person is quite drastic or coercive in nature resulting in attracting civil consequences. If a bank account of a person is attached, it would certainly cause severe prejudice to… Read More ...
The Karnataka High Court has held that If a payment gateway had no knowledge that the funds transferred to the merchant IDs of the accused were derived from criminal activity related to a scheduled offense and it did not knowingly assist the accused in concealing or transferring illicit proceeds as clean money, it cannot be said to have committed any offense under… Read More ...
The Supreme Court has held that The Larger Bench of the Supreme Court was called upon to decide the following questions: - (a) Whether the Supreme Court, in the exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, can order automatic vacation of all interim orders of the High Courts of staying proceedings of Civil and Criminal cases… Read More ...
The Delhi High Court has held that Contempt of Courts Act , 1971 . S. 2(c)(i) : Contempt of Court-Criminal contempt-For making Scandalous , unwarranted and baseless imputations against several sitting Judges of the High Court and district Courts-Court has sentenced a lawyer to six months imprisonment after holding him guilty of criminal contempt. [S. 5, 14, 15] Contemnor has made certain… Read More ...
The NCLT, Mumbai Bench has held that The NCLT has inter alia held that the date of default with respect to a corporate guarantor is the date on which the guarantor fails to make payment after being called upon to pay, and that the date of default of the principal borrower is not relevant for determining the date of default of the… Read More ...