CIT v. Abdull Aziz Abdul Kadar (Bombay High Court)

Court: Bombay High Court
Head Notes:

S. 50C : Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation- Transfer of tenancy right-Provision of Section 50 C is not applicable- Revenue has accepted the decision of Shri Atul G. Puranik v. ITO (2011) 132 ITD 499 (Mum)( Trib)- Appeal of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 45, 49]
On appeal by the Revenue dismissing the appeal the Court held that provisions of section 50C of the Act is not attracted in case of tenancy rights. The Tribunal relied on the Shri Atul G. Puranik v. ITO (2011) 132 ITD 499/11 ITR 120/ 141 TTJ 69 (Mum.)(Trib.). Departmental counsel has accepted that decision in the case of Shri Atul G. Puranik (Supra) has been accepted by the Revenue hence no appeal has been preferred. (ITA No. 1821 of 2013 dt. 12-10-2015)(AY.2007-08)(ITA No. 6934/M/2011, dt 15-2-2013)
CIT v. Abdull Aziz Abdul Kadar (Bom)( HC) www.itatonline.org
[Coram : Hon’ble Shri Justice M.S. Sanklecha Hon’ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni]

Law:
Section(s): S. 50C
Counsel(s): Mr. Ajeet Mawani, Advocate
Dowload Pdf File Click here to download the file in pdf format
Uploaded By itatonline
Date of upload: February 10, 2025
One comment on “CIT v. Abdull Aziz Abdul Kadar (Bombay High Court)
  1. kailash Bhatia says:

    Thanks for sharing

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*