Dy. CIT v. Hardcastle Restaurant Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)

Court: Mumbai Tribunal
Head Notes:

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Abated assessment-No incriminating material was found-Alleged bogus purchases-Addition was deleted. [S. 69C, 132]
Dismissing the appeal of the revenue the Tribunal held that without any incriminating material found during search proceedings the addition cannot be made in respect of abated assessment. Followed, PCIT v. Abhisar Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (2023)454 ITR 212 / 293 Taxman 141 / 332 CTR 385 / 225 DTR 105 (SC), PCIT v. Meeta Gutgutia (2017) 82 taxmann.com 287 / 395 ITR 526 (Delhi)(HC), CIT v. Gurinder Singh Bawa (2016) 386 ITR 483 (2017) 79 taxmann.com 398 (Bom)(HC) (ITA No. 4215, 4224, 4311, 4313 & 4315 /M/2024 dt. 14-1-2025) (AY. 2013-14 to 2018-19)
Dy. CIT v. Hard castle Restaurant Pvt. Ltd. (Mum.)(Trib.) www.itatonline.org.
[Coram : Hon’ble Shri Anikesh Banerjee, JM and Hon’ble Miss Padmavathy S., AM]

Law:
Section(s): 153A
Counsel(s): Dr. K. Shivaram, Sr. Advocate and Shashi Bekal, Advocate
Dowload Pdf File Click here to download the file in pdf format
Uploaded By itatonline
Date of upload: September 5, 2025

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*