SANJAY VRAJLAL KOTHARI V ITO 25(2)(3), MUMBAI (ITAT Mumbai)

Court: ITAT MUMBAI
Head Notes:

However, we find that the assessing officer has incorrectly added the whole amount of deposit found in the impugned bank account which was not pertained to the assessment year under consideration. Further as per the submission of the assessee there are some amount deposited in the bank account on account of dividend, bank interest and friendly loan taken by the assessee in respect of which the assessee has referred various document placed in the paper book.

Law:
Section(s): SEC. 68
Counsel(s): CA ANIL TULSIDAS THAKRAR
Dowload Pdf File Click here to download the file in pdf format
Uploaded By CA ANIL TULSIDAS THAKRAR
Date of upload: August 21, 2023
One comment on “SANJAY VRAJLAL KOTHARI V ITO 25(2)(3), MUMBAI (ITAT Mumbai)
  1. Vijender jindal says:

    Excellent

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*