Court: | Bombay High Court |
Head Notes: | S. 147 : Reassessment-Revenue directed to guidelines for reassessment- CBDT to issue guidelines to its officerrs based on the Order with clear instructions which are to be strictly followed. [S. 148, 149, 150, 151, Art. 226] The Hon’ble Bombay High Court, inter alia directed the revenue to adhere to certain guidelines to be followed for reassessment proceedings, they are: (a) While communicating the reasons for re-opening the assessment, a copy of the standard form/request sent by the Assessing Officer for obtaining approval of the Superior Officer should itself be provided to the assessee. This would contain comment or endorsement of the Superior Officer with his name, designation and date. The Assessing Officer shall not merely state the reasons in the letter addressed to the assessee. (b) If the reasons make reference to any other document or a letter or a report, such document or letter or report should be enclosed to the reasons. Such a portion as it does not bear reference to the assessee concerned could be redacted. (c) The order disposing of the objections should deal with each objection and give proper reasons for the conclusion. (d) A personal hearing shall be given and minimum seven working days advance notice of such personal hearing shall be granted. (e) If the Assessing Officer is going to rely on any judgment/order of any Tribunal or Court reference/ citation of these judgments/orders shall be provided along with notice for personal hearing so that the assessee will be able to deal with/distinguish these judgments/ orders. A copy of the Order to be placed before the CBDT to issue guidelines to all its officers based on these directions with clear instructions that they shall be strictly followed. (WP NO. 546 OF 2022 dated February 15, 2022) Tata Capital Financial Services Limited v. ACIT (Bom.)(HC) |
Law: | Income-Tax Act |
Section(s): | 147 |
Counsel(s): | J.D. Mistri, Senior Advocate |
Dowload Pdf File | Click here to download the file in pdf format |
Uploaded By | ITAT ONLINE |
Date of upload: | March 4, 2022 |
Invoking / summoning the AID of ‘COMMON SENSE’ (for just a CHANGE)(:
Is this not TIME, ripe enough, to sincerely mind and devoutly consider the utility value , if at all any, – validity/ enduring benefit /advantage,- of this and similar other Court cases; do so, in the context of / with concerted Focus on the Amendments of the law (related enactments) as proposed in the Budget 2022 !
Point of POSER : What purpose, if at all, litigation /case law being perpetually generated / developed could be honestly expected to serve, should the law be amended /kept on being amended, with no let up but at the same or greater (no less) pace !?!