Disclaimer: This file has been uploaded by a visitor and has not been verified by us for authencity. If you
intend to rely on the judgement, you MUST download a copy from the offical website of the respective Courts or Tribunal. Please note that
we take no responsibility whatsoever for the contents of the file.
In the above the hon’ble supreme court inadvertently ordered that the state commission president has to write the examination which wasn’t challenged, and order is very clear about 3(2)(b) only. The president appointment is dealing with sec 3(2)(a). Which is a big anamoly and to be rectified