Court: | Supreme Court of India |
Head Notes: | WIPRO Finance Limited Vs CIT(Supreme Court of India) Sub-Whether foreign exchange fluctuation of Rs 1.10 crore incurred for the purpose of borrowing in the business of financing and leasing is a revenue expenditure allowable u/s 37 and also whether the ITAT has power to entertain a new claim of Rs. 2.46 crores for the first time- decision in the case of NTPC and Goetze(India) limited explained. The Hon’ble three judges bench of Supreme Court in this case was considering assessee’s appeal against the order of the High court which had reversed the findings of ITAT that the expenditure of Rs 1.10 crore towards foreign exchange fluctuation loss was a revenue expenditure. The Hon’ble Court based on the famous decision in the case of India Cement as well as Empire Jute held that as no new asset was created ,the expenditure was fully allowable. Two important issues regarding claim of forex difference and power to entertain all- together new claim before ITAT receive the stamp of approval by the highest court of the country Ramesh Patodia |
Law: | Income-Tax Act |
Section(s): | Section 37,43A and 254 of Income-tax Act,1961 |
Counsel(s): | Counsels |
Dowload Pdf File | Click here to download the file in pdf format |
Uploaded By | CA Ramesh Patodia |
Date of upload: | April 17, 2022 |
Leave a Reply