Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

This section is now closed. Please ask your questions at our new Q&A section
Query asked by R.Team on April 4, 2020

Re: Prosecution – Tax deduction at source-S.276B

A Declaration filed by the assessee under the scheme for settlement of tax arrear arising out of the assessment of income under an order passed u/s 143(3) is rejected by the authorities on the ground that he was prevented from filing such a declaration under the scheme by virtue of clause (ii) of s.9(a) which disentitles an assessee where a prosecution is initiated u/s 276B for violation of TDS provisions for the said assessment year. Please advise

Answered by

An assessee is disentitled under clause (ii) of s.9(a) to file a declaration where a prosecution is initiated on or  before the date of declaration. On an apparent reading of the clause(ii) in isolation nto in the context one would agree with the authorities however, on a closer reading  of s.9 one would gather that it is only where the prosecution is in relation to a tax arrear relating to an assessment year that an assesseee is prohibited from opting for the scheme. In the facts of the case, the prosecution is not launched in relation to an assessment year for which the tax arrear are in dispute under the appeal before the appellate forum. The assessee is well within his rights to file a declaration under the scheme and settle the dispute and seek relief. 


 

One comment on “Prosecution – Tax deduction at source-S.276B
  1. Ravikant Pathak says:

    The word used in section 9(2)(ii) is “Instituted” and not “initiated”. Instituted means when the court takes the cognizance of the offence. Thus, even if the prosecution is initiated, the assessee should be allowed to opt for the scheme. Kindly read question number 22 of FAQ on this issue.

    Also read section 9(d) where the word used in “initiated”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*