Assessee had not filed a return of income for the assessmet year 2016-17 on the ground that it had been issued a TRC under laws of Mauritius, it was entitled to take benefit of provisions of article 13 of DTAA between India and Mauritius. Reassessment notice was issued to the assesee. The assessee filed writ petition cahllnging the issue of notice under section. 148 of the Act. the Revenue contended that Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) issued was not a conclusive evidence on assessee’s residential status, thus, held assessee ineligible for treaty benefits. Court hedl that nothing in form of information or material had been put on record by revenue to conclude that Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) issued to assessee was not a viable legal document. Accordingly reassessment proceedings initiated against assessee is set aside and matter was to be remanded back to AO to confront assessee with relevant material. (AY. 2016-17)
Vodafone Mauritius Ltd v. ACIT (2023) 294 Taxman 43 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Sale of shares-Tax Residency Certificate under laws of Mauritius-Capital gains-Nothing in form of information or material had been put on record-Reassessment notice is quashed and set aside-Matter was to be remanded back to AO to confront assessee with relevant material-DTAA-India-Mauritius. [S. 148, Art. 13, Art. 226]