High Court of Karnataka appointed Chartered  Accountant  (respondent No. 3) for purposes of verification of books and papers of three transferor companies in connection of a merger scheme and to submit his report. High Court accepted report and had sanctioned merger- Petitioner filed a complaint against Respondent No. 3 alleging that Respondent No. 3 had committed professional misconduct and submitted incorrect reports after scrutiny of books and papers of certain companies- ICAI, however rejected said complaint .   Dismissing the petition the Court held that there was no infirmity in view taken by Disciplinary Committee of Institute of Chartered Accountants that as Respondent No. 3 was appointed by Karnataka High Court and reports were submitted to the Karnataka High Court, it was only High Court of Karnataka, which could take a view on reports submitted by Respondent No. 3 .