S. 56 : Income from other sources-Amalgamation-No transfer of shares-Addition is deleted.[S. 47(vii), 56(2)(vii(c)]
DCIT v. Rajoo Engineers Ltd. (2025) 211 ITD 159 (Rajkot) (Trib.)S. 56 : Income from other sources-Amalgamation-No transfer of shares-Addition is deleted.[S. 47(vii), 56(2)(vii(c)]
DCIT v. Rajoo Engineers Ltd. (2025) 211 ITD 159 (Rajkot) (Trib.)S. 56 : Income from other sources-Purchase of flat prior to insertion of clause (x) of sub-section (2) of section 56 by Finance Act 2017-Provision is not applicable-Addition is deleted.[S.56(2)(x)]
Kajari Banerjee. (Smt.) v. ITO (2025) 211 ITD 358 (Kol.)(Trib.)S. 56 : Income from other sources-Under construction property-Gift-Increase in GST adjustment of GST value in total value of consideration would not fall within ambit of section 56(2)(x).[S. 43CA, 50C, 56(2)(x)]
Jayantilal Umashankar Chavji. v. NEAC(2025) 211 ITD 537 (Mum) (Trib.)S. 56 : Income from other sources-Tolerance limit-DVO’s valuation report-Amendment introduced by Finance Act, 2020, increasing tolerance limit under section 56(2)(x)(b)(B) from 5 per cent to 10 per cent, has retrospective effect and applies to assessment year 2018-19.[S.56(2)(x)(b) (B)]
NFAC v. NRB Developers. (2025) 211 ITD 728 (Mum) (Trib.)S.54F : Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-Return not filed-Exemption cannot be denied.[S 139, 148]
Satyanarayana Viswanadha. v. ITO (2025) 211 ITD 173 (Visakhapatnam) (Trib.)S. 54B : Capital gains-Land used for agricultural purposes-Growing paddy crop-Lands used for agricultural purposes two years immediately preceding date on which land was sold-Entitle to exemption. [S. 45, 143(3)]
Rahul Bajpai. v. DCIT (2025) 211 ITD 580 (Raipur) (Trib.)S. 54B : Capital gains-Land used for agricultural purposes-Land was not used for agricultural purposes for two years immediately preceding date of transfer-Not entitle to exemption. [S. 45]
Amartbhai Mandanbhai Desai. v. PCIT (2025) 211 ITD 195 (Ahd) (Trib.)S. 50C : Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-Transfer of development rights-Notionally assignment of development rights-Provision is not applicable.[S. 45]
DCIT v. Minal Urmil Shah. (2025) 211 ITD 136 (Ahd) (Trib.)S. 50 :Capital gains-Depreciable assets-Block of assets-Immovable property-Stamp value and actual consideration-Matter is remanded to Assessing Officer for de novo consideration as per the provisions of section 43CA read with section 50C of the Act.[S.43CA, 45, 50C]
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 211 ITD 608 (Mum) (Trib.)S. 48 : Capital gains-Mode of Computation-Sale consideration-Joint development agreement-Merely on the basis of statement-Addition cannot be made.[S. 45, 132(4)]
ACIT v. Pavani Structurals (P.) Ltd. (2025) 211 ITD 415 (Hyd) (Trib.)