Month: August 2018

Archive for August, 2018


India Power Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 63 ITR 42 (SN) (Kolk)(Trib.)

S.115JB: Book profits —Generation and distribution of electricity — Accounts to be prepared under state legislation — Provision computing book profit is not applicable.

Samar Singh Parihar v. ITO (2018) 62 ITR 61 (Jabalpur)(Trib.)

S. 69A : Unexplained money – Cash deposit in the bank account of the assessee – source of such cash deposit was cash withdrawal from the account of one contractor – Held, entire cash deposit cannot be taxed – such cash deposit is part of business receipts – Held, to meet the interest of justice 8% taxable.

Hemant Kumar Pradhan v. ITO (2018) 62 ITR 57 (Cuttack)(Trib.)

S.69: Unexplained investments – Books rejected in original proceedings and income estimated at 8 percent. of the gross contact receipts- Addition cannot be made u/s 69 in reassessment proceedings. [S.147]

Ritu Bajaj (Smt.) v. Dy. CIT (2018) 63 ITR 594 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 69 :Unexplained investments – jewellery found during the course of search – Held, jewellery found was within the normal limits of jewellery specified under Board’s Circular, no addition justified.

ITO v. Dhanlaxmi Equipment P. Ltd. (2018) 63 ITR 33(SN)/193 TTJ 236 (Jaipur)(Trib.)

S.68: Cash credits – Share application money – In the absence of any falsity having been found in the documents submitted by the assessee to prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the share transaction, these documents could not be summarily rejected as had been done by the Assessing Officer- Deletion of addition is held to be justified .

Rajinder Singh v. ACIT (2018) 63 ITR 550 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits – cash deposited in bank – Held, opening balance was no doubted – Held, nothing to show that opening cash balance was utilized somewhere else – Held, accepted part deposit out of the said balance and only part not accepted. Held, addition not justified.

Ramswaroop Saudagar v. ITO (2018) 63 ITR 262 (Jaipur)(Trib.)

S. 50C : Capital gains – Full value of consideration – Stamp valuation – Conversion of agricultural land into residential plots – AO applied S. 50C – CIT(A) held that income in the nature of business income therefore, S.50C not applicable – Held, S. 45(2) not taken into consideration and therefore, matter remanded back to CIT(A). [S. 45(2)]

Royal Wood Industries v. Jt. CIT (2018) 62 ITR 321 (Amritsar)(Trib.)

S. 40A(3) :Expenses or payments not deductible – Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits – payment exceeding Rs. 20000 – payment to truck driver who generally insist payment in cash – Held, AO did not doubt genuineness of the payment – Disallowance cannot be made .

GKN Driveline (India) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2018) 62 ITR 784 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure -Capital or revenue – Trade mark expenses for use allowable as revenue expenses .

Genesisi Datacomp P. Ltd. v. ITO (2018) 63 ITR 699 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S.37(1):Business expenditure – Capital or revenue – Renovation of leased office premises is revenue expenses allowable [S.31]