Year: 2018

Archive for 2018


Regency Mahavir Properties v. ACIT (2018) 169 ITD 35/64 ITR 628 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 69 :Unexplained investments – On money -No addition can be made on the basis of the documents found from premises of third party neither the name of assessee was mentioned nor any evidence was found for purchase of any property [ S. 132, 153A ]

Regency Mahavir Properties v. ACIT (2018) 169 ITD 35 / 64 ITR 628(Mum) (Trib.)

S. 153A : Assessment – Search-When there was no search proceedings against the assessee , assessment made in consequence of notice issued under section 153A, is invalid and void ab initio . [ S. 69,132 ]

Mohan Meakin Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 168 ITD 99 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 153C : Assessment – Income of any other person – Search – Illegal payments -Addition made on the basis of third party statement who have retracted and without giving an opportunity of cross examination initiation of proceedings was held to be not valid [S.132 ]

Dismissing the appeal of the assessee the Tribunal held that , claim for deduction under S. 35(1) could not be allowed where it did not maintain separate books of account in respect of its research and development activity, however the direction given by the CIT was modified allowing the AO to examine the claim .( AY. 2009-10) Nivo Controls (P.) Ltd. v. CIT (2018) 169 ITD 139 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue -Scientific research – Revision was held to be justified and the direction given by the CIT was modified allowing the AO to examine the claim [ S. 35(1)]

Allahabad Bank v. DCIT ( 2018) 169 ITD 189 ( Kol) ( Trib)

S. 254(1): Appellate Tribunal- Additional ground- Failure to deduct tax at source- Issue which was not contested before the CIT(A) , it is open to the assessee to challenge the disallowance first time before the Tribunal, additional ground was admitted and matter was remanded to the file of AO for adjudication on merits. [ S. 40(a)(ia), 44AB,194A,194I, Art. 265 ]

PCIT v. Rahman Exports (P.) Ltd. (2018) 169 ITD 10 (All)( Trib)

S.92C:Transfer pricing –Arm’s length price – Variation in closing stock in order to compute operating cost was not considered hence adjustment was held to be not valid .

Saamag Developers (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 168 ITD 649 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure -Seized papers- Merely on the basis of seized papers addition cannot be made when the assessee has not purchased any land from persons mentioned in the seized documents [ S. 132 ]

Keshavji Bhuralal Gala v. ACIT (2018) 169 ITD 23 /165 DTR 8/ 193 TTJ 227 / 63 ITR 67 (SN)(Mum) (Trib.)

S. 56: Income from other sources – Purchase of property from a company wherein the assessee is also director can not be assessed as income from other sources , as the amendment to assess difference arising out of stamp duty value and actual sale consideration as income in case of sale of property for a consideration less than stamp duty value of property was incorporated into statute by Finance Act, 2013 with effect from 1-4-2014[ S. 56(2)(vii) ]

Bennett Coleman & Co. Ltd. v. ACIT (2017) 168 ITD 631/( 2018)192 TTJ 377 / 164 DTR 145 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 50B : Capital gains – Slump sale –Cost of acquisition- Transfer of its business division to its subsidiary against shares and debentures is not a slump sale but exchange hence provision would not be applied .[ S.2(42C), 45 ]

Vikas Solvextracts (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2018) 168 ITD 692/192 TTJ 591 / 164 DTR 161 (Kol) (Trib.)

S. 45 : Capital gains – Stock in trade -Transfer of land to developer for construction of commercial complex and letting the flats which it got from developer and offering the income as rental income , subsequent sale of flats was held to be assessable as capital gains and cannot be assessed as business income by applying the provision of S. 45(2) of the Act . [ 28(i), 45(2)]