S. 12AA : Procedure for registration –Trust or institution-Refusal of registration was held to be not justified without bringing any evidence to demonstrate that the object of the Trust is not charitable .[ S.2(15) ]

S. 12AA: Procedure for registration – Trust or institution – Power to reject application cannot be delegated by the CIT to its subordinates.[ S.12A ]

S. 12AA: Procedure for registration – Trust or institution – Establishment of diagnostic centre is in line or coherent with objective of medical relief – Non-communication of amended trust deed is a mere irregularity

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes – Revenue had not proved that registration granted u/s. 12AA had been withdrawn- Claim of exemption u/s. 11 would not be denied-Matter reamanded to CIT(A). [ S. 12AA,13 ]

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes – Micro financing activity is in nature of trade, commerce or business hence is not entitle to exemption as charitable purpose. [ S.2(15) ]

S. 10A : Free trade zone – Period of ten consecutive years to be reckoned from year of commencement of manufacture and not from incorporation.

S.10(23C) : Educational institutions- For grant of approval u/s.10(23C)(vi) the institution must exist solely for educational purpose and not for profit. The other objects such as encourage sportsman and adventurous spirit in the pupils and those connected with the institution; to print, publish and exhibit films, journals, periodicals, books for the diffusion of useful knowledge and to provide residential accommodation either free of cost and educate, train and assist financially the social workers, staff, students, orphans objects other than educational objects- Rejection of application for grant of approval is justified.[ S.10(23C)(vi) ]

S. 9(1)(vii) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India – Fees for technical services – Referral fee earned by the assessee is held to be not taxable in India – DTAA-India -Switzerland .[ Art, 7 ]

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India – Royalty – Assessee, a US company, was wholly owned subsidiary of an Indian company entered into an agreement with another US company to acquire patent and technical information related to manufacturing of two products belonging to said foreign company – Assessee got said products manufactured from its holding company in India and same were subsequently sold in US – This shows clear business connection with India – royalty paid by assessee to US company in terms of patent agreement was taxable in India under S. 9(1)(vi) of the Act.

S. 9(1)(i): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India – Business connection – In absence of furnishing any shred of credible evidence that shows direct involvement from Japan in making sales to customers in India estimation of rate of net profit at 10 per cent was reasonable and amount of net profit attributable to marketing activities carried out in India would be 30 per cent of amount of net profit relatable to sales in India- DTAA-India -Japan [ Art, 5, 7(a),( 7(c) ]