Month: September 2019

Archive for September, 2019


Dy.CIT v. Shekhar G. Patel (2019) 70 ITR 456 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment—After the expiry of four years-Assessing officer not analysing details of expenditure while forming belief that income had escaped assessment-No specific expenditure could be termed as incurred exclusively for personal needs of assessee — Completed assessment of assessee after four years could not be reopened [ S.148]

ITO v. Shanti Constructions (2019) 73 ITR 115 (Agra)(Trib.)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Construction business-Project completion method-Consistently following the method-Department should accept the method.

Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India P. Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 71 ITR 301/ 179 ITD 78 /( 2020) 196 DTR 349/ 208 TTJ 956(Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment–Accrual of income-Year of taxability–Rate of tax-The income was offered in the subsequent year (basis the billing done), tax rate being the same, interest of revenue was not affected, therefore income could not be taxed on accrual basis in the current year. [S. 2(24), 5]

Greaves Cotton Limited v. ACIT (2019)73 ITR 406 (Mum.) (Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arms’ length price-Failure by authorities to follow procedure prescribed-Matter remanded. [R. 10B]

Dy. CIT v. K. T. Kunjumon (2019) 70 ITR 445 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 80IA : Industrial undertaking-Assessee running a cinema production house-Each new project for new film not be considered as reconstruction of business already in existence-Nothing on record to show that there was any transfer of used machinery or plant to a new business-Production of a cinema film would amount to manufacturing or processing of goods-Entitled to deduction.

ACIT v. Abad Exim Pvt. Ltd. (2019) 70 ITR 719 (Cochin )(Trib.)

S. 80HHC : Export business —Assessee’s claim confined to sale to export house —Export house not claiming deduction with regard to export of goods manufactured by assessee — Entitled to deduction.

Kotu Sarat Kumar v. DCIT (2019) 71 ITR 147 (Vishakha) (Trib.) Kotu Anasuya (Smt.) (Late) v. DCIT (2019) 71 ITR 147 (Vishakha) (Trib.)

S. 71 : Set off of loss-One head against income from another – Commercial expediency-Interest paid on borrowed funds which are used for business purpose is an allowable expenditure which can be set off against interest income and the resultant losses can be set off against other head of income. [S. 57(iii)]

Dinesh Goswami v. DY. CIT (2019) 70 ITR 580 (Indore)(Trib.)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Assessee keeping money in locker and explaining that it was out of savings to perform his daughter’s marriage—Money in locker not taxable. [S. 132]

VBC Jewellery v. Dy. CIT (2019) 70 ITR 481 (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 69 : Income from undisclosed sources-Bogus purchases-Assessee not producing material evidence of parties or intermediaries from whom it made purchases for verification-Addition on account of bogus purchases justified.

Dy.CIT v. Khurana Rolling Mills P. Ltd. (2019) 73 ITR 613 (Chd.)(Trib.) Dy.CIT v. Khurana Steels Ltd. (2019)73 ITR 613 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Income Surrendered during survey proceedings on account of undisclosed debtors is business income and not deemed income-assessee entitled to set off of business loss against such surrendered income. [S. 28(i), 69B, 133A]