Month: September 2019

Archive for September, 2019


Dy. CIT v. Albasta Wholesale Services Ltd (2019) 70 ITR 504 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure—Foreign exchange fluctuation loss—department accepting that assessee had commenced its business in earlier year—Denial of claim on reason that no business commenced for instant year not justified.

Tata Autocomp Hendrickson Suspensions Pvt. Ltd. v. DY. CIT (2019) 70 ITR 712 (Pune) (Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure—Provision for warranty-Not justified in disallowing the expenses.

Gold Finch Jewellery Ltd. v. DY. CIT (2019) 70 ITR 629 (Ahd.) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure—Labour charges—All details of labourers including addresses and permanent account numbers available with authorities but not verified—Assessee deducting tax at source from payment of labour charges to labourers—late deduction of tax at source—Not a basis for making disallowance.

Dy.CIT v. Metso Minerals (India) Pvt. Ltd. (2019) 70 ITR 655 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure—Prior period expenditure— Invoice received and payment made in April 2009—Amount crystallized during year cannot be treated as prior period item.

EPE Process Filters And Accumulators Pvt. Ltd. v. DyCIT (2019) 70 ITR 586 (Hyd.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure—Expenditure on purchase of Indian premier league cricket match tickets to distribute amongst long standing customers to improve its business relations—akin to distribution of gifts or articles on special occasions to customers —Deductible.

Jt. CIT v. Flipkart India Pvt. Ltd. (2019) 73 ITR 392(Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Sale of goods through e-commerce at less than cost price-transaction bona fide-loss created due to predatory pricing not capital expenditure.

DY. CIT v. Metso Minerals (India) Pvt. Ltd. (2019) 70 ITR 655 655 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital—Part of interest capitallised and transferred to pre-operative expenses— Disallowance again on interest amounts to double deduction — Addition to be deleted.

Bharat Mines And Minerals v. ACIT (2019) 70 ITR 684 (Bang.) (Trib.)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Block of assets-No requirement that business use of each of assets of block to be seen and examined and depreciation to be allowed only in respect of assets used. [S.2(11), 50]

Sumitomo Corporation v. Dy. DIT (2019)73 ITR 443/ (2020) 205 TTJ 815 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Supply of equipment-sale from outside India-Risk and title transferred outside India and no transaction taking place in India-Customs clearance, inland transportation done by buyer on its own-No permanent establishment involved in sale–Income is not taxable in India-DTAA–India–Japan [S. 44D, Art. 7, 24]

Amit Jindal v. Dy. CIT (2019) 70 ITR 545 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 2(22)(e) : Deemed dividend-Advance to shareholders— Interrelated group concerns—Advances given by one concern to another concern to tide over short-term financial deficiency to be treated as commercial expediency—Amount given not in nature of any loans or advances to assess as deemed dividend.