Month: March 2020

Archive for March, 2020


Naina Saluja v. DCIT (2019) 76 ITR 135 (Luck.)(Trib.)

S. 153 : Assessment-Limitation-Capital gains-Reference to valuation officer–No extension of time for assessment as in case of reference under S. 142A-Assessment order to be passed on or before 31.03.2016 whereas the same was passed on 19.05.2016-Order barred by limitation. [S. 45, 50C, 55A, 142A]

Mukesh Chand Garg v. ITO (2019) 76 ITR 344 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Approving authorities giving approval in mechanical manner-Reassessment invalid-Department failing to bring on record any evidence of income earned by assessee-Entire amount of doubtful transactions added as assessee’s additional income-Impermissible. [S. 147, 148]

Hari Steels and General Industries Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 75 ITR 90/ 104 Taxmann.com 293 ( Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment–Information obtained from the sales tax department–No independent enquiry or application of mind-Reassessment invalid-Assessment–Notice-Issuance of notice u/s. 143(2) is mandatory – Failure renders the reassessment invalid [S. 69C, 143(2), 148]

Priya Tools (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2019) 182 DTR 249 / 201 TTJ 505 / 73 ITR 546 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Income from other sources–Reassessment proceedings initiated on suspicion-when nothing incriminating was found to suggest that anything over and above Re. 1 per share was paid by assessee-Reassessment is held to be invalid. [S.56(2)(viia), 148]

Lakshya Ice & Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 73 ITR 95 / 201 TTJ 211 / 56 CCH 281 / 181 DTR 153 (Agra)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment–Reassessment proceedings initiated without any application of mind and examination of information received from investigation wing amounts to borrowed satisfaction–Notice is quashed. [S. 148]

Bhura Ram (Late) v. ITO (2019) 76 ITR 681 (2020) 206 TTJ 29 (UO ) (Jaipur)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment–Legal representatives-Notice issued in name of deceased assessee-No subsequent notice issued on legal heirs of deceased assessee-Reassessment is not valid. [S. 148, 159]

Kishore Vithaldas v. JCIT (2019) 76 ITR 623 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Jurisdiction of authorities-No specific order passed by principal CIT under section 120(4)(B) authorising Joint Commissioner to act as an AO-Reassessment Order passed by Joint Commissioner liable to be quashed. [S. 2(7A), 120(4)(b), 148]

Vinod Commodities v. ACIT (2019) 182 DTR 49 / 200 TTJ 273 (Jodhpur)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-AO should record ‘reason to believe’ that certain income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment–This belief should be based on independent enquires/application of mind and not on borrowed satisfaction ie basis information from Investigation Wing- Sanction-Sanction granted by the CIT under S. 151 by simply writing “Yes, I am satisfied” is also invalid. [S. 147, 148]

Magan Behari Lal v. DCIT (2019) 75 ITR 322 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years–No scrutiny assessment–Reopening solely based on information from Investigation Wing–No independent application of mind– Reassessment is held to be invalid. [S. 148]

Kellogg India (P) Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 182 DTR 280 / 201 TTJ 393 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Adjustment on account of MODVAT credit has to be made in respect of closing stock, opening stock, purchases and sales.