Month: March 2020

Archive for March, 2020


Dy.CIT v. Mahavir Multitrade P. Ltd. (2020) 77 ITR 165 /180 ITD 730/ 192 DTR 257/ 206 TTJ 640 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Compensation for not complying with terms of contract-Civil consequence for not complying with certain terms of contract and had nothing to do with any offence- No violation of law–No disallowances can be made by applying the explanation 1.

CIT v. Siemens Nixdorf Information Systemse Gmbh ( 2019) 184 DTR 277 ( Bom) (HC)

S.45: Capital gains- Capital loss- Assignement of loan- Capital asset – Allowable as capital loss. [ S. 2(14)(a) , 2 (47), Wealth tax Act , 1957 S. 2( e ). ]

PCIT v. Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd ( 2020) 185 DTR 390 /113 taxmann.com 303 ( Bom) (HC) Editorial : Notice issued in SLP filed by revenue , PCIT v. Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd ( 2021 ) 281 Taxman 365 ( SC)

S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure – Exempt income – Recording of satisfaction – AO needs to record his non-satisfaction having regard to the sou motu disallowances claimed by the assessee in the context of its accounts. It is only thereafter, the occasion to apply rule 8D of the Rules for apportionment of expenses can arise- AO discussing and not accepting is not sufficient -Order of Tribunal is affirmed . [S.14A(2) , R.8D ]

Kuthannur Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO (2020) 420 ITR 358 / 180 DTR 313/ 312 CTR 465/ 271 Taxman 118 (Ker)(HC) Peringottukurussi Service Co -Operative Bank Ltd v .ITO ( 2020) 420 ITR 358 / 180 DTR 313/ 312 CTR 465/ 271 Taxman 118 (Ker)(HC) Vadakkenchery Service Co -operative Bank Ltd v .ITO ( 2020) 420 ITR 358 / 180 DTR 313/ 312 CTR 465 / 271 Taxman 118(Ker)(HC)

S. 80P : Co-operative societies -CBDT – Binding precedent – Clarificatory circulars for guidance of Government Officers is not binding on Tribunal- Circulars issued by a Government Department cannot have any primacy over the decision of the jurisdictional High Court-Not entitle to deduction . [ S.80P(2) ,119 ]