Month: March 2020

Archive for March, 2020


Surendra Engg. Corpn. v. JCIT (2020) 180 ITD 708 (Mum.) (Trib.)

S. 271D: Penalty–Takes or accepts any loan or deposit-Loan from partner–Bonafide belief–Levy of penalty is held to be not justified. [S. 269SS, 273B]

B.E. Billimoria & Co. Ltd. v. PCIT (2020) 180 ITD 808/ 192 DTR 114/ 206 TTJ 650 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue- Return of income-Without audit report-Revised return along with audit report-Loss is allowed to be carried forward–Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 44AB, 80, 139(3)]

Trimex Fiscal Services (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (2020) 181 ITD 10 (Kol.) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Issue of shares at premium-Commissioner had neither conducted any enquiry on issue nor recorded finding that assessee’s calculation was unsustainable in law-Revision is held to be bad in law. [S.56(2)(viib), R.11U, 11UA]

Shamken Multifab Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 2020)78 ITR 214/ 190 DTR 77/180 ITD 756 /205 TTJ 696 ( Delhi) (Trib) /Dy. CIT v. Arhum Syntex (P) Ltd (2020)78 ITR 214/ 190 DTR 77/180 ITD 756 /205 TTJ 696 ( Delhi) (Trib) Dy.CIT v. Shamken Cotsyn Ltd (2020)78 ITR 214/ 190 DTR 77/180 ITD 756 /205 TTJ 696 ( Delhi) (Trib) Dy.CIT v. Shamken Spinner Ltd (2020)78 ITR 214/ 190 DTR 77/180 ITD 756 /205 TTJ 696 ( Delhi) (Trib)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal–Appeal maintainability-Application filed under S. 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, had been admitted and moratorium under S. 14 of 2016 code, had been declared-Appeal filed by revenue against assessee under provisions of Act, could not be allowed to be continued during course of moratorium period. [Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, S.7, 14, 238]

Emsons Organics Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 180 ITD 762/ 203 TTJ 1(UR) (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal–Delay of 615 days–Health problem– Delay is condoned. [S. 253(3)]

Moody’s Analytics Knowledge Services (India) (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (TDS) (2020) 180 ITD 804 / 192 DTR 100/ 206 TTJ 646(Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 201 : Deduction at source-Failure to deduct or pay–Interest-Remittance of TDS was made online on prescribed date, credit to Government’s account was instant-No interest could be levied for delay in remitting TDS to credit of Government even if online portal showed a delayed date. [S. 201(IA)]

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 180 ITD 776 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 145A : Method of accounting–Valuation-MODVAT credit does not have any impact on profit of assessee and thus, unutilised MODVAT credit could not be added to value of closing stock.

Nasir Ali v. ACIT (2020) 181 ITD 30 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 120 : Jurisdiction of income-tax authorities-Additional Commissioner can function as an AO only when jurisdiction has been assigned to him-No directions or orders assessment order passed by Additional Commissioner was illegal and without jurisdiction. [S. 120(4)(b), 124]

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 180 ITD 776 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 80HHC : Export business–Sale of scrap-Income from such scrap would tantamount to recoupment of cost of raw material/production and, therefore, was includible in profits of business.

ITO v. Swati Housing & Construction (P.) Ltd. (2020) 180 ITD 854 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Labour expenses-ad hoc disallowance-Held to be not justified. [S. 145]