High Court of Delhi: Facts of the case During previous year relevant to A.Y. 2005-06, the assessee had taken loan from the bank. During the period spanning between A.Y. 2005-06 to A.Y. 2011-12, interest on loan paid by the assessee to the bank was allowed as deductible expenditure under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It is only… Read More ...

---

Mumbai Tribunal : S. 2(14)(iii) : Capital asset-Agricultural land-Sale of agricultural land -Land revenue record shown as “Lagavadi Yogya Sherta“ (Cultivable land)-Vegetables and minor millets grown-Land situated in Raigad District-No condition is prescribed under the provision of section 2(14)(iii) of the Act that active agricultural activity should be there at the time of sale of the land-Only condition… Read More ...

---

High Court of Bombay: Facts The assessee had claimed exemption under section 10(38) in respect of long-term capital gain earned from sale of shares of a scrip. During the course of investigation, it was revealed that the said scrip was a penny stock and the broker through whom the transaction by way of sale of shares was effected by… Read More ...

---

Gujarat High Court : Court explained ratio of Supreme Court decisions of Mak Data 2013(38) taxmann.com, 448. (SC) and Reliance Petro 2010(189) Taxman 322 (SC) while answering question on penalty u/s 271(1)(c) proposed by Revenue . Read More ...

---

CHANDIGARH TRIBUNAL : S. 12AA : Procedure for registration-Trust or institution-Plastic Waste Management-Preservation of Environment as defined in Section 2(15) of the Act-Eligible for exemption-Denial of registration is not valid. [S. 2(15), 11, 12A, 12AA(1)(b)(ii), Form No. 10A, Constitution of India Art, 14, 19 and 21, 47, 48-A, 51-A(g), Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Water (Prevention and Control… Read More ...

---

MUMBAI ITAT: 4 Keeping in view the fact that the assessee is corporate assessee and subjected to statutory audits and therefore, the books could not rejected in a light manner, the matter stand remitted back to the file of Ld. AO for readjudication with a direction to the assessee to substantiate the transactions carried out by him… Read More ...

---

MUMBAI ITAT: We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the facts of the case. We find that the AO has applied the provisions of section 44AD and 44AF of the Act in assessing assessee’s income of Rs.40,81,308/- under totally misunderstanding of facts and law. We find that the assessee’s total turnover is at Rs.20,40,65,412/- and… Read More ...

---

MUMBAI ITAT: It is clear from the above findings of CIT(A) that AO has not followed guidelines laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of GKN Driveshaft Ltd., accordingly, we do not find any infirmity in the order of CIT(A) for holding that reopening was not valid. Read More ...

---

MUMBAI ITAT: BOGUS PURCHASE: After considering rival contentions, we find no reason to interfere with the stand of Ld. CIT(A) since the assessee was engaged in trading activities and could not achieve the sales turnover without purchase of material. The turnover of the assessee has not been doubted by the revenue and the assessee is in possession… Read More ...

---

BOMBAY HIGH COURT: DTVSV-A is a beneficial statute FAQ 61 of the circular 21/2020 dated 4th December 2020 issued by the CBDT to the extent that it restricts appeals to the ones ‘dismissed in limine’ are not only adverse to the interest of the assessee but also contrary to the object and reasons of DTVSV-A. Read More ...

---